Wednesday, June 18, 2014

RE: [IAC#RG] SUPREME COURT CRYING FOR JUSTICE

               I am sharing my plight . I have filed a Writ Petition No.543/2008  in Bombay High Court to challenge the promotion criteria of senior level posts in Navratna PSU ONGC on the ground of arbitrariness and illegality .The WP has been admitted on 25.8.2008 since then it is pending for final hearing. In between a matter of promotion has crop up wherein my one year ACR/PAR has been lost by ONGC. I have filed SLP in Supreme Court and after hearing both sides ,  Honourable Supreme Court made by order dated 26.09.2011 has made  a request to  Bombay High Court to decide the original WP within six months. It is strange that in the present system of constitution Supreme Court has no power to issue direction to the High Court. Now more than two and half years are over  and the case has not yet been finalized so far. Every time benches of judges changed due to forth coming date after date.Now I have been retired also on 30.11.2011 and still I am pursuing the case with Bombay High court. I respectfully say that if the order in the form of "request" has no meaning ,the Honourable SC should desist to issue such orders to the High Court. Instead , the WP should be transferred suo-motto for final decision in the interest of justice.
Regards 

DWARIKA PRASAD
General Manager(Retd.)
ONGC
MUMBAI-400101
Mobile No.9920055524



From: sudhanshuranjan@hotmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:23:37 +0000
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] SUPREME COURT CRYING FOR JUSTICE

Dear Mr. Raiayani,
Thanks for the informative mail. The problem of judicial delays is a major issue which destroys people's faith in the system. I am writing a book on it. I would request you to forward any such information/document or anything relevant.
Regards,
SUDHANSHU RANJAN
ROOM NO. 511, TOWER-II
DD NEWS, DOORDARSHAN BHAWAN
COPERNICUS MARG
NEW DELHI - 110001
PH.: 011 23097645 (O) +91 9868527070 (M)



Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:41:38 +0530
From: fastjustice@gmail.com
To:
Subject: [IAC#RG] SUPREME COURT CRYING FOR JUSTICE



SUPREME COURT CRYING FOR JUSTICE


Appex Court appeals to the Parliament for legislating appropriate laws and to the Government for rationalising decision making process for stemming vicious and frivolous cases and appeals being filed. Read the last paras in the Surbroto Roy Sahara's recent Supreme Court Judgement.


(Bhagvanji Raiyani)

Chairman & Managing Trustee

Forum For Fast Justice



"REPORTABLE"

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 57 OF 2014


Subrata Roy Sahara …. Petitioner

versus

Union of India and others …. Respondents


J U D G M E N T

Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.



149. A lot of these hearings consumed this Court's full working day. Hearing of the main case, consumed one full part, of the entire summer vacation (of the Supreme Court) of the year 2012. For the various orders passed by us, including the order dated 31.8.2012 (running into 269 printed pages) and the present order (running into 205 printed pages), substantial Judge hours were consumed. In this country, judicial orders are prepared, beyond Court hours, or on non-working days. It is apparent, that not a hundred, but hundreds of Judge hours, came to be spent in the instant single Sahara Group litigation, just at the hands of the Supreme Court. This abuse of the judicial process, needs to be remedied. We are, therefore of the considered view, that the legislature needs to give a thought, to a very serious malady, which has made strong inroads into the Indian judicial system.

150. The Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted, with frivolous litigation. Ways and means need to be evolved, to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession, towards senseless and ill-considered claims. One needs to keep in mind, that in the process of litigation, there is an innocent sufferer on the other side, of every irresponsible and senseless claim. He suffers long drawn anxious periods of nervousness and restlessness, whilst the litigation is pending, without any fault on his part. He pays for the litigation, from out of his savings (or out of his borrowings), worrying that the other side may trick him into defeat, for no fault of his. He spends invaluable time briefing counsel and preparing them for his claim. Time which he should have spent at work, or with his family, is lost, for no fault of his. Should a litigant not be compensated for, what he has lost, for no fault? The suggestion to the legislature is, that a litigant who has succeeded, must be compensated by the one, who has lost. The suggestion to the legislature is to formulate a mechanism, that anyone who initiates and continues a litigation senselessly, pays for the same. It is suggested that the legislature should consider the introduction of a "Code of Compulsory Costs".

151. We should not be taken to have suggested, that the cost of litigation should be enhanced. It is not our suggestion, that Court fee or other litigation related costs, should be raised. Access to justice and related costs, should be as free and as low, as possible. What is sought to be redressed is a habituation, to press illegitimate claims. This practice and pattern is so rampant, that in most cases, disputes which ought to have been settled in no time at all, before the first Court of incidence, are prolonged endlessly, for years and years, and from Court to Court, upto the highest Court.

152. This abuse of the judicial process is not limited to any particular class of litigants. The State and its agencies litigate endlessly upto the highest Court, just because of the lack of responsibility, to take decisions. So much so, that we have started to entertain the impression, that all administrative and executive decision making, are being left to Courts, just for that reason. In private litigation as well, the concerned litigant would continue to approach the higher Court, despite the fact that he had lost in every Court hitherto before. The effort is not to discourage a litigant, in whose perception, his cause is fair and legitimate. The effort is only to introduce consequences, if the litigant's perception was incorrect, and if his cause is found to be, not fair and legitimate, he must pay for the same. In the present setting of the adjudicatory process, a litigant, no matter how irresponsible he is, suffers no consequences. Every litigant, therefore likes to take a chance, even when counsel's advice is otherwise.

153. Does the concerned litigant realize, that the litigant on the other side has had to defend himself, from Court to Court, and has had to incur expenses towards such defence? And there are some litigants who continue to pursue senseless and ill-considered claims, to somehow or the other, defeat the process of law. The present case, is a classic illustration of what we wish to express. Herein the regulating authority has had to suffer litigation from Court to Court, incurring public expense in its defence, against frivolous litigation. Every order was consistently and systematically disobeyed. Every order passed by the SEBI was assailed before the next higher authority, and then before this Court. Even though High Courts have no jurisdiction, in respect of issues regulated by the SEBI Act, some matters were taken to the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (before its Lucknow Bench). Every such endeavour resulted in failure, and was also sometimes, accompanied with strictures. Even after the matter had concluded, after the controversy had attained finality, the judicial process is still being abused, for close to two years. A conscious effort on the part of the legislature in this behalf, would serve several purposes. It would, besides everything else, reduce frivolous litigation. When the litigating party understands, that it would have to compensate the party which succeeds, unnecessary litigation will be substantially reduced. At the end of the day, Court time lost is a direct loss to the nation. It is about time, that the legislature should evolve ways and means to curtail this unmindful activity. We are sure, that an eventual determination, one way or the other, would be in the best interest of this country, as also, its countrymen.

…………………………….J.

(K.S. Radhakrishnan)

…………………………….J.

(Jagdish Singh Khehar)

New Delhi;

May 6, 2014.



Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

No comments:

Post a Comment