Dear Hemraj
It is a complex issue, and we simply don't have the time or desire to
come out in public. People like me and my other core members of IAC
value our privacy and find that we can be much more effective if we
maintain a low profile.
Using the media is a double edged sword. Today everybody in media has
great respect for us, but they are equally bound to report statements
made by other people, like say Ajay Maken or Kumar Vishwaas. IAC does
not care about such people or what they say or what India believes.
How does it concern us if Anna Hazare says he is Gandhian or not ?
Once these Delhi elections are over everybody will forget and move on
to the next tamasha.
IAC does not want to get involved in small time political
controversies. Our agenda is broader and with a longer horizon.
IAC does not disagree that Arvind Kejriwal's LokPal Bill campaign,
using Anna Hazare as a figurehead and with Kiran Bedi as Kejriwal's
junior assistant, was conducted under IAC's banner because the
promoters of IAC paid Kejriwal's NGO - the PCRF - to run an IAC
campaign which later got out of his control.
It is Kejriwal's problem that he later made Kiran Bedi and Prashant
Bhusahn non-official trustees of PCRF without telling anybody, and
they thought they had some stake in IAC once Kejriwal abandoned using
IAC's banner..
It is Kejriwal's and Bedi's collective problem that PCRF is now merged
into Aam Aadmi Party and Kiran Bedi is thereby also a member of Aam
Aadmi Party and is liable to be disqualified if she is elected.
If you want to take this further, go to ECI and ask for AAP's audited
accounts showing PCRF funds and the role POLAND plays in all this :-).
Sarbajit
On 1/25/15, Hemraj Jain <jainhemraj59@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Sarbajit Roy
>
> It still does not address the issues raised.
>
> Entire India knows and given to understand by media etc that (i)- Anna is a
> Gandhian (ii)- Anna agitation was by India against corruption. Even during
> last three four days in this controversy every channel has said that Anti
> corruption movement of Anna by IAC.
>
> This is evidence of the fact that India was cheated in the name of Gandhism
> and the organization which now is unnecessarily getting bad name is IAC
> that is why I said that IAC needs to take press conference.
>
> Regards
>
> HRJ
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Mr. Jain
>>
>> IAC takes whatever steps it deems necessary.
>>
>> For your information we took it up with The Hindu last year, that it
>> was being incorrectly stated that Gen VKS was a member of IAC along
>> with Anna Hazare.
>>
>> http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/bjp-is-the-only-party-that-thinks-of-national-interest-says-vk-singh/article5739915.ece
>>
>> " Clarification
>>
>> Referring to an earlier version of the report above, Sarbajit Roy,
>> national convenor of India Against Corruption has pointed out that
>> BJP's candidate from Ghaziabad Gen (Retd.) V.K. Singh has never been
>> associated with India Against Corruption.
>>
>> "Gen (Retd.) V.K.Singh was never associated with India Against
>> Corruption and neither was Mr. Anna Hazare a part of it. Referring to
>> them in the context of IAC is misleading especially in context of
>> political activity," Mr. Roy has said. "
>>
>> Just yesterday Gen V K Singh has also clarified himself that he was
>> never a part of IAC.
>>
>> http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-vk-singh-claims-to-never-have-been-a-part-of-india-against-corruption-movement-2055188
>>
>> IAC does not respond to lightweights like "Dr." Kumar Vishwaas
>>
>> Insofar as Mr. Anna Hazare.ji is concerned, IAC has always
>> acknowledged his work in popularising our movement's name, and we
>> salute his decision to stay non-political.
>>
>> We don't know what you mean by "Gandhian". IAC is not Gandhian. I dont
>> think even Annaji himself claims to be a Gandhian - he also backs
>> IAC's ideology and is 100% committed to Bhagat Singh's revolutionary
>> path. It was only that traitor lady Kiran Bedi who was projecting Anna
>> as Gandhian and non-violent.
>>
>> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/File:Anna_pays_homage_HRA_Bhagat_Singh.jpg
>> .
>> IAC had objected to all those BJP moles as far back as 9 Dec 2010.
>>
>> On 5 April 2011 I personally complained to the Police Commissioner of
>> Delhi against Kiran Bedi who had arranged for some anti-national
>> persons from VHP for Anna and who were raising anti-India slogans and
>> disrespecting the national flag.
>>
>>
>> https://we.riseup.net/india_against_corruption/iac-complaint-against-anna-hazare-and-kiran-bedi
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>>
>> On 1/25/15, Hem Raj Jain <hemrajjain1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear All
>> >
>> > To what level Indian public life has stooped ? I think that now
>> > on-wards
>> > the entire debate on IAC & ACMA should be focused on the role of Anna.
>> >
>> > On Thursday on TV channel 'Times Now' two office bearers of Aam Aadmi
>> Party
>> > (AAP) Kumar Vishwas and Ashish Khetan revealed that Baba Ramdev, Kiran
>> Bedi
>> > and General (Ret) V.K. Singh were moles in anti - corruption movement
>> of
>> > Anna (ACMA) and these moles were insisting in the meetings of ACMA to
>> > go
>> > soft on BJP and instead wanted the corruption of only Congress party
>> > governments to be highlighted.
>> >
>> > When asked by anchor of 'Times Now' that why Arvind Kejariwal, the
>> supreme
>> > leader of AAP (which was part of ACMA) did not tell the people about
>> > this
>> > farce at that time, the AAP office bearers said that we did not listen
>> > to
>> > these BJP moles and went ahead to expose corruption in BJP governments
>> > also, moreover Anna was leading ACMA movement hence it was incumbent on
>> > Anna to take action against these moles but Anna then said do not make
>> much
>> > of this issue.
>> >
>> > In defense of their integrity these office bearers of AAP said on this
>> > TV
>> > program that the case against Karnataka BJP chief Minister Yedurappa
>> > were
>> > initiated by ACMA national executive member Justice Hegde and some writ
>> > petitions were filed by ACMA national executive member Advocate Prasant
>> > Bhushan in Court against corrupt BJP governments of Madhya Pradesh and
>> > Chhatisgarh.
>> >
>> > But this is not a valid defense. Justice Hegde acted against Yedurappa
>> etc
>> > as Lokayukta of Karnataka and not on behalf of ACMA. Similarly Advocate
>> > Prashant Bhushan also did not file these writ petitions on behalf of
>> > ACMA
>> > against corrupt BJP governments. Moreover ACMA never came on streets
>> > against corrupt BJP governments (as they did against Congress). This
>> > clearly shows that ACMA movement and its leader Anna and its national
>> > executive members were consciously & deliberately biased in favor of
>> > BJP
>> > and against Congress.
>> >
>> > Entire world knows that Mahatma Gandhi, being father of nation, has a
>> > special place in the hearts and minds of Indians and that was the
>> > reason
>> > when prominent Gandhian Anna Hazare gave a clarion call to the people
>> > of
>> > India to come on streets against corruption then millions of people
>> > did
>> so
>> > all over India.
>> >
>> > But, in view of above, as is now known that Anna exploited the pious
>> > sentiments (towards Gandhian practices) of Indians merely and
>> fraudulently
>> > for bringing BJP to power in Union government at Delhi, then this needs
>> to
>> > be thoroughly exposed - if precious innocent faith of the people of
>> > India
>> > in pious things is to be preserved and protected.
>> >
>> > Because Indian media is avoiding asking clarification from Anna on this
>> > matter it is expected that Mr. Sarabjit Roy the head of real 'India
>> against
>> > corruption' (IAC, which as per Mr. S. Roy is registered body and
>> > nothing
>> to
>> > do with ACMA) will immediately take press conference in order to
>> constrain
>> > Anna Hazare to explain why he allowed ACMA to be compromised in favor
>> > of
>> > BJP and against Congress, in an ethically most despicable manner and
>> > why
>> > Anna misused the name of IAC in ACMA.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Hem Raj Jain
>> >
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment