Re: [HumJanenge] Re: SC rules that Info Commission cannot order disclosure of information under Sec 18

Respected Sarabajit Singh, I agree with comments of Shri M.K. Gupta. My sincere appeal to you being a highly learned, elderly citizen and doing yeoman services to society, please respects others' feelings too and don't hurt others by avoidable words, statements etc. It is not befitting to your status surely (not very particularly herein matter). Who knows even if Jam is selected (may be with some limitations or not matching your standards) might do better than many past/ present CICs/ SICs. It is indisputable fact that in-spite of 6 years what is the fate of real implementation of RTI Act all over India. You nicely talk about GIta, Upnishads etc but I wonder why you have to knowingly or unknowingly hurt others feeling at any time.Please do not take this my suggestion as personal or with any hard feelings but it is due to my  respect for you. Thanks & Best Regards, Mukund Parikh /Mumbai       -- On Tue, 13/12/11, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Re: SC rules that Info Commission cannot order disclosure of information under Sec 18 To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Tuesday, 13 December, 2011, 9:38 PM Dear Sarab,  I understand that you have no right to comment like this on the capability of a person and should not discourage any aspirant like this.   This job will be done by the Selection Committee for ICs. The integrity, sincerity and bonafides also count and members have no doubt about these virtues in Jam. I Do not know about their views on you.    Whether I am wrong or right can be decided on the reactions of the members on my aforesaid comments. From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> To: "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" <HumJanenge@googlegroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 7:08 PM Subject: [HumJanenge] Re: SC rules that Info Commission cannot order disclosure of information under Sec 18 Dear Mr Jam I am given to understand that you have applied for post of Central Information Commissioner. The applicants are expected to be persons of eminence in fields like law. If you cannot answer your own question, then I suggest you withdraw from the field  <wink> <wink> PS: The SC has answered your query. The CIC sits in section 18 to levy penalty u/s 20. Sarbajit On Dec 13, 9:15 am, C K Jam <rtiwan...@yahoo.com> wrote: > In a recent judgment, the Apex Court has ruled that the SIC/CIC cannot order disclosure of information while decising Complaints under Sec 18 of the RTI Act. >> The full judgment is attached. >> The whole purpose of the RTI Act is to disseminate information. What is the big point in the Commission hearing Complaints under Sec 18, if the information cannot be disclosed ? >> Beats me completely. >> RTIwanted. >>  Commission cannot order disclosure of information while heairng complaint under Sec 18.pdf > 231KViewDownload