Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by DoPT officers.

I believe it to be a case of utmost cunning that this U turn was made:

Consider the following advantages:

1. Hijacking the oppose corruption initiative from opposition forces

2. Tell the world who is the boss in waiting without actually taking the responsibility till the feedback from public becomes apparent

3. Complete the process of bringing any remaining anti Yuvraj individuals to their knees

4. The brazen aggressive style in which it was done may have been prior calculated to connect to the youth of India today - 12 crore in number supposed to vote for the first time- who will look for and may be more comfortable with a careless youth image and big dreams rather than the meticulous hard working Modi type.

etc.

Regards

Neeraj Gupta

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:33 PM, govindan menon <tcgmenon@hotmail.com> wrote:

Majority of the people take a wrong direction  while analyzing any important incident. Any bill/ ordinance can be introduced again without any change if the ruling party has  majority in both house of  parliament. So here bill is not an important factor at all.  The most important factor  is Rahul's behaviour and consequences of making  him PM. Italian Sonia  may be a  strong   lady. But she has no control  over his son's erratic behaviour. So it is time to consider the consequences of lifting a person on to a pedestal for which he is not suitable. Rahul's behavior is erratic, like Nero played the fiddle when Rome was burning.  Muhammad Tuglak said one morning that the capital will be shifted to Deogir (now Daulatabad) . Similarly  if Rahul announces  one fine day that  Kashmir will be handed over to  Pakistan to keep good  relation with them. Will  all the  caravan  of slaves/ sycophants  of the Congress   start supporting him? Can we rule out all these possibilities when he is not behaving like a matured leader.

Tcg

---

From: gaurjk@hotmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:20:24 +0530
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by DoPT officers.

1/10/13
Today,s news that Rahul sets eyes on RTI Act gives an indication about his thinking on bringing political parties within the purview of RTI act. It is further reported that the proposed bill designed to amend the RTI Act to exclude political parties from its purview was referred to the Standing Committee at Rahuls,s insistence. ,People have a right to know the functioning and source of funding of political parties, is atrributed to Rahul,s thinking.
We should press on this view rather than questioning the motive behind CVC,order. Defensible or not defencible at least this order has shifted focus on opaque functioning of political parties.
Regds
JLKGaur
 

From: manavasi.seshadri@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net; beniwalg@ymail.com
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:53:30 +0530
Subject: RE: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by DoPT officers.

Hullo    Pl quickly ask Rahul about RTI  being made applicable for political
  parties . I would like to ask a dozen questions . I am sure he would like to
take the lead in agreeing to this after he condemned in a hurry the
ordinance to protect the convicted guys !!! Seshadri 
 
-----Original Message-----
  From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
[mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy
  Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:46 PM
To: G.S. Beniwal; indiaresists
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by
DoPT officers.
 
Dear Mr. Beniwal
 
It is of the CVC (Central Vigilance Commission) - which is administratively
  under DoPT.
http://www.cvc.nic.in/nacs26082010.htm
 
BUT, the NACS is an extremely badly drafted document which has been drawn up
by some NGOs and corrupt ex-babus. It is still in "final draft" form since
  2010 and it is a major embarrassment to DoPT and UPA.
 
So I am only using it to "poke" DoPT.
Hope this clarifies.
 
Sarbajit
 
On 9/27/13, G.S. Beniwal <beniwalg@ymail.com> wrote:
  > Roy sir, may i know which authority  issued this policy and does this
policy
> applies to MoD/departments ?.   rgds. beniwal (66yrs)
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
  > To: secy_mop <secy_mop@nic.in>; jsata <jsata@nic.in>; jsv-dopt 
> <jsv-dopt@nic.in>; indiaresists <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
  > Sent: Friday, 27 September 2013 6:58 AM
> Subject: [IAC#RG] Violation of "National Anti-Corruption Strategy" by 
> DoPT officers.
>
>
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in