Dear All,
Moderator is just wasting his talent and our time in expressing anti-Indian/radical views so that he is noticed. Hope he understands that had he been in Pakistan where his sympathy lies - he would not have even dared to open his mouth. He is Kejriwal of social media. He seems to be distasteful talented mind.
Regds.
SR
Regards,
SR
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:54:05
To: <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Arundhati Roy: Big money' is backing Modi to end
resistance
Please read the message posts carefully.
It is Arundhati Roy who holds those views. I researched the
circumstances of her statement and tended to agree with her.
A) The so-called Instrument of Accession has no legal force. If it is
such a powerful document in law, what prevents us from going to the UN
or the ICJ with it.
B) IAC's stand that India includes J&K and Bangladesh and present
Pakistan does not rely on such frivolous and hollow grounds as you
suggest.
C) It is your opinion that " .. the Indian army marched into J&K to
drive out the invaders of 1947 ..". Equally, Ms. Arundhati Roy seems
to opine that the same Indian Army was an occupying force to brutalise
the simple innocent Kashmiri people who were never consulted and for
which Mountbatten (mischievously) noted that a referendum be taken on
the accession instrument.
D) If Arundhati Roy was wrong, why was the sedition inquiry against
her not prosecuted ?
Sarbajit
On 6/8/14, Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am shocked that the moderator of this forum holds the view that ' "J&K is
> NOT an integral part of India" + "India is an occupying force" are
> undeniably correct.' I hope Sarbajit has heard of the Treaty of Accession
> signed by Raja Hari Singh of J&K before the Indian army marched into J&K to
> drive out the invaders of 1947!
>
> ravi
>
>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment