Mr Vikram Simha,
The full judgment of the Allahabad HC, referred to in the trailing posts is attached to this post.
(NOTE to Moderator: In case attachments are not allowed, please upload in files segment of the group)
RTIwanted
From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel
A summary is given here: http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/7344-allahabad-high-court-order-clarifying-sec-18-a.html
RTIwanted
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
From: C K Jam <rtiwanted@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Date: Monday, 9 May, 2011, 7:35 AMVikram,There is another judgment of the Allahabad High Court (related to beneficiaries of CMs discretionary fund) in which it "respectfully" disagreed with this part of the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which you referred to.In common language, the Allahabad HC ripped apart this part of the Gujarat HC order.The whole purpose of the RTI Act will be lost if a Commission does not decide (and direct) on whether information has to be disclosed or not disclosed, while dealing with Complaints under Sec 18.RTIwantedFrom: Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 7, 2011 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: [HumJanenge] Cabinet note not secret: Info panel
With All dissussions From All eminent and learned freinds , I Have Read And with Me an Gujarath High Court order which Reads As " Power under Sec 18 is Limited to Hold enquiry into Complaint and If Necessary to Impose Penalty -- Information Commission has no Jursidiction to Pass order directing authority to part with information"
No comments:
Post a Comment