Re: [IAC#RG] The beginning of the end for AAP

Dear Sangeeta

This group has been throughout focused when it come to AAP

1) For a long time we have been regularly saying that Arvind Kejriwal
and Party are the foreign financed Congress "A" team (and B team of
BJP).
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/12/iacrg-aap-team-of-congress-b-team-of-bjp.html

2) For a long time we have been saying that forces for corruption
will install AAP as its puppet Govt in Delhi.
"IAC has reason to believe that the organised national forces for
corruption (which go beyond party affiliations) shall even collude to
the extent of ensuring that their AAP puppet (who may not be Arvind)
is the new face of government n Delhi."
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/11/iacrg-public-notice-to-iacs-old.html

3) For a long time we have said that "A vote for AAP is a vote for Congress"
"That the true masters behind AAP are the same foreign secret
societies who set up and financed the Congress as well as control
parts of the BJP (such as Mr. Narendra Modi).
..
That it is the ancient practice spanning centuries of these foreign
societies to identify corruptable, unpatriotic Indians and place them
in positions of power so that foreigners can rule from behind the
scene."
http://rti4citizens.blogspot.in/2013/11/iacrg-vote-for-aap-is-vote-for-congress.html

Unlike AAP, the IAC is consistent in what it says and does. We don't
make false promises which we have no intention of keeping. And because
what we say is unpalatable (and true), IAC's message now is only meant
for the few (apolitical) non-aam people who can appreciate its truth.

Sarbajit

On 12/22/13, Sangeeta Bhasin <sangeetabhasin@gmail.com> wrote:
> mY SYMPATHIES are with AAP. If they take people's mandate to form a Govt
> with outside support there is a problem. When they made it clear they are
> ready for re-elections, there was a problem. When they tell the
> Lt.Governer that BJP has more seats than them and they should form the
> Govt. there is a problem.
>
> CAN ALL THE CRITICS, WELLWISHERS AND GENERAL PUBLIC DECIDE WITHOUT
> CONSULTING AAP, WHAT THEY WANT THIS PARTY TO DO.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 4:52 PM, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> People who voted to AAP has done so for seeing AAP govt in Delhi. If any
>> body expected a different opinion from those voters by again asking
>> whether
>> to form govt with outside support is committing time waste. There is no
>> justification in undermining people's mandate reflected in the concluded
>> election by getting further opinions from the voters and public. AAP this
>> time committed big blunder which they must realise before taking a final
>> decision
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 2:03 PM, SURESHAN P
>> <sureshandelhi@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> If AAP forms govt with support of the congress that is unfair to the
>>> Delhi voters. BJP got 32 plus one of their independent,in the 70 member
>>> assembly, They lost three seats to AAP with margin of less than one
>>> thousand i,e Sadar, Vikaspuri and Delhi cant, and five seats with less
>>> than
>>> two thousand votes. They have got very huge margin from some seats. In
>>> Kirari their winning margin of 48,526 is double than the votes secured
>>> by nearest AAP rival. In Krishna Nagar also their CM Candidate secured a
>>> huge margin over nearest rival. In total vote share also they outshined
>>> other parties. This calculation shows that Delhi In fact voted for BJP
>>> rule. In other words More voters wanted to see a BJP rule than AAP . If
>>> AAP
>>> is a genuine and model political force they could have rejected congress
>>> unconditional support by saying that more people voted for BJP rule. If
>>> congress did not want to go for re-election they could have extended the
>>> unconditional support to BJP rather than forcing AAP to committing the
>>> sin
>>> of forming government when people did not chose so.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> By agreeing to form a Govt with Congress support, AAP has shown that
>>>> they are as unprincipled and untrustworthy as everybody else.
>>>>
>>>> RIP : AAP
>>>>
>>>> Sarbajit
>>>> www.indiaagainstcorrupyion.org.in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>>>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>>>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>>>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>>>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
>>> P. Sureshan,
>>> Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
>>> NLC( India ) Law Office
>>> No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph:
>>> 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
>> P. Sureshan,
>> Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
>> NLC( India ) Law Office
>> No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph:
>> 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075
>>
>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>>
>
>
>
> --
> sangeetabhasin
> starlite optiks
> mumbai
> 9820236048
>