God only knows when will Modi take proper action regarding bringing black money, but presently the impression is different especially after 627 name to SCI / SIT fiasco (which will not bring black money worth mentioning, even if cases are properly pursued)
PM Narendra Modi is increasingly turning out to be not only a rabble-rouser (who,even as per editorial of Times of India November 1, 2014, promised during election campaign about black money worth hundreds of Trillion of Rupees and should have brought this black money back to India by this time) but also as a paper-tiger who is finding it difficult (under the pressure of corrupt politicians, bureaucrats, business interests, wealthy criminals etc, despite absolute majority in parliament - which is under his absolute control & influence at least for the time being) to make the following new or amended laws (as has been discussed in media) in order to tackle the menace of black money in India:-
(1)- Declare all illicit wealth stashed abroad and in India as 'National Wealth'
(2)- In India land and landed properties are registered at under - value to evade registration fees etc. To stop this Govt should purchase under-valued (as registered) properties at declared price.
(3)- In India black money is generated by under - invoiced domestic and foreign business transactions. To stop this Govt should purchase under-invoiced transactions at declared price.
(4)- In India black money is regularized by untruly claiming it as agriculture income. To stop this though there may or may not be be tax on agriculture income, but (i)- farmers should also be brought under legal obligation to file income tax returns and (ii)- Crop record of Patwari in Tehsil / Taluka of every district in India should be suitably improved and be used to catch tax evasion (which so-called farmers do through claiming over - yield).
(5)- Laws for self - declaration of foreign accounts with consent for Government of India (GOI) to verify declaratory details of foreign accounts
(6)- Bilateral international treaties, under legislated law, for such accounts verification.
(7)- Moving all the countries of UN, under legislated law, to frame UN laws for mutual disclosure of account details of citizens / residents of other countries
(8)- Investment in shares through Participatory- notes should also legally require disclosure of personal information as is the case with other Indian share holders.
Regards
Hem Raj Jain
Bengaluru
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:30 AM, robby <sharmarobby@hotmail.com> wrote:
See all that you need to understand is that India is in control of hundreds of Mafia and Judicial mafia is the biggest of them because it gives birth to the other Mafia. I do not know the Position in Karnataka but in U.P. there is a unwritten law in banks that they do not approve Loans to Advocates. Why? How many of your Lawyers give you any Receipts for the money you pay them? Now from these same set of deplorable Advocates you get your Judges. So do not be carried away by the shining black Robes worn by the Judges because under these Shiny Judges it is just another crook engaged simply in promotion of his career enjoying immunity from almost everything and pretending to dispense Justice although in India Justice is done in aly one case out of a thousand and that too only after the introduction of the Collegium system. THE JUDICIARY OF INDIA has always been and still Is GOVERNMENT's HAREM and the Judges are the GOVERNMENT's CONCUBINES Dancing free for the GOVERNMENT and for a price for the rich & powerful. The One in a Thousand Cases seemingly decided in Public Interest is only a trailer to play to the media while actually the Godown is rotting with millions of undecided and wrongly decided cases.Robby SharmaKanpur
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:57:30 +0530
From: gigijohn8263@googlemail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] CORRUPT POLITICIAN HAS THE LAST LAUGH AND JUDICIARY BECOME LAUGHING STOCKMr Mohanachandran appears to be the Devil's Advocate. He forgets that Jayalalita has been convicted by the Court and is NOT undertrial. His personal happiness at her release is what sycophancy is all about. In fact such sycophants are the stepping stones of corruption, as after scores of sycophants have glorified the criminals, they actually start believing that they are Gods themselves! As far as Amma is concerned she does not want to even see anyone who is not her sycophant!On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:52 PM, P.Mohana Chandran <p.mohanachandran50@gmail.com> wrote:Mrs.Indira Gandhi's election was set aside by Allahabad High Court for electoral malpractice.Justice Krishna Iyer,granted stay of the judgement.This facilitated Mrs Gandhi to get the Representation of Peoples' Act amended with retrospective effect so that spending money over and above the stipulated limit even by a recognised party which was an electoral malpractice ceased to be a malpractice resulting in the Allahabad High Court judgement getting reversed.We cannot rule out the possibility of the Prevention of Corruption Act getting amended excluding members of Legislatures from the clutches of the law.As Lalluji.Jayalalithaji and OmPrkash Choutalaji are presently not able to 'remote control' the Central Government, Prevention of Corruption Act may not be amended to save them.They may have to work out their remedy before the Appellate Courts.If a politician receives gifts and become a Billionaire with such gifts,he can not be proceeded under Prevention of Corruption Act in view of the change in law brought in to save some Big politicians who were able to remote control the then Government at the Centre.Till the accused persons (whether politician or otherwise) exhaust the last chance of Appeal,let us not treat them as criminal.In Tamilnadu there is objection to to keeping of Jayalalithaji's portraits in public offices.As per the existing guidelines portraits of some leaders like Gandhiji,Arinjar Anna and serving CM can be kept in public Offices.TN Government can amend the guidelines to include former CMs in the list so that the controversy can be avoided.Ofcourse Karunanidhiji's portrait too can be kept in such a situation.As a person born and living in Tamilnadu ,I am extremely happy that Jayalalithaji was allowed to comeout on bail.When she was in Jail,each day was a nightmare for us.P.Mohana Chandran,On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:Even though there is no presumption of innocence after conviction so long as an appeal provided by law due to experience of coviction being found to be erroneous in many cases there is no presumption of guilt also and therefore grant of bail pending appeal has to be fairly liberal.
Sent from my iPadDear Kirity RoyGet your facts clear. In the present case the ACCUSED person has been already tried and found GUILTY and therefore the person is no more an accused but a CONVICT. Unlike the parameters to be considered while granting bail to an accused person/s parameters to grant bail to a convicted person are differentOn Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Kirity Roy <kirityroy@gmail.com> wrote:Yes, I do agree with the understanding of Mr. Shanti Bhushan.Accused person in a criminal trial should not be treated as guilty. It is the duty of prosecution (State) to prove him / her guilty before the court.Are we going to establish "presumption of guilt" in he tune of police / state ?? Are we going deny "Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty" ??At the same time I must support strongly the main message of Mr. N S Venkataraman of Nandini Voice.--On 21 October 2014 21:52, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:I do not see any objection to the grant of bail pending appeal provided it is conditional on the appeal being quickly heard and decided.
Sent from my iPad
Kirity Roy
Secretary
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha
(MASUM)
&
National Convenor (PACTI)
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity
40A, Barabagan Lane (4th Floor)
Balaji Place
Shibtala
Srirampur
Hooghly
PIN- 712203
Tele-Fax - +91-33-26220843
Phone- +91-33-26220844 / 0845
e. mail : kirityroy@gmail.com
Web: www.masum.org.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in--
Commander John Philipose, VSM (Retd)
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment