Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: Third party right under RTI Act upheld

Dear Sandeep,

Thanks for this important Tip.

Regards,

Dr Sushil Kumar

a sufferer whom RTI could not save as one fights lonely battle and one is retaliated against for seeking even RTI information. No one seeks info on one's behalf even if it be in Public interest.

Wing Commander Dr Sushil Kumar

formerly Director ICHR compulsorily retired 

Chairman, Association of Historians

---

From: sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, 3 October 2011 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: Third party right under RTI Act upheld

i feel it will still have to be disclosed, even if we say it is not to
be disclosed (if the information does not fall under section 8) even
after procedure followed by the PIO

On 10/2/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> In view of the Delhi High Court decision on 3rd rights, I advise all my
> fellow list members to always clearly mention in BOLD type at the start of
> any correspondence which is submitted to public authorities "CONFIDENTIAL,
> AND NOT TO BE DISCLOSED WITHOUT CONSENT".
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Trap Rti <rtitrap@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NGO haramis
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Sidharth Misra
>> <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Friends,
>>>
>>> Here's an important decision of DHC.
>>>
>>> Arvind Kejriwal's challenge fails to convince Delhi High Court on
>>> third party rights.
>>>
>>> http://goo.gl/84JHg  (Judgment)
>>>
>>> http://goo.gl/NA54n  (News Clip)
>>>
>>> Sidharth Misra
>>>
>>
>>
>


--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181