Re: [HumJanenge] Fwd: Third party right under RTI Act upheld

Section 11(1) is quite complete in itself and operates IN ADDITION TO section 8 exemptions (which as you have rightly pointed out also afford protection to 3rd parties).

Section 11(1) is a further DISCRETIONARY facility given to a PIO who must weigh (larger) public interest in disclosure versus the personal rights of 3rd party.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:56 AM, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:

i feel it will still have to be disclosed, even if we say it is not to
be disclosed (if the information does not fall under section 8) even
after procedure followed by the PIO

On 10/2/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> In view of the Delhi High Court decision on 3rd rights, I advise all my
> fellow list members to always clearly mention in BOLD type at the start of
> any correspondence which is submitted to public authorities "CONFIDENTIAL,
> AND NOT TO BE DISCLOSED WITHOUT CONSENT".
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Trap Rti <rtitrap@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NGO haramis
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Sidharth Misra
>> <sidharthbbsr@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Friends,
>>>
>>> Here's an important decision of DHC.
>>>
>>> Arvind Kejriwal's challenge fails to convince Delhi High Court on
>>> third party rights.
>>>
>>> http://goo.gl/84JHg   (Judgment)
>>>
>>> http://goo.gl/NA54n   (News Clip)
>>>
>>> Sidharth Misra
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA
Phone: 91-99929-31181