Saturday, March 10, 2012

Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

The CIC is not only toothless but ineffecient and corrupt.

Some of my cases were heard after two years.

The Cab Sectt (RAW), DOPT, MHA, NSCS, CBI etc consistently refuse to
comply with orders.

In several cases, notice was not sent to me, and cases decided ex
parte. The CIC could not show proof of despatch.

In one case involving the NSCS, Shri Pankaj P. Shreyaskar claimed to
have sent the intimation to some others by Fax. The Fax numbers were
found to be wrong. The case was decided in favour of NSCS. I later
learned that Shri Shreyaskar was being considered for posting to the
NSCS.


In one case, involving the RAW, my presence was recorded, by forrging
my name and signature on the attendance sheet. In one case, an early
hearing was held, without notice to me, without the concurrence of the
CIC, by some one else writing a sentence below the typed order signed
by the CIC (Wajahat Habibullah), who agreed that there had been an
error by his office. He advised me to file a review petition. When it
was heard, he dismissed it, saying the CIC has no powers of review.

The intelligence agencies and CBI a have been exempted, but not the
Armed Forces and other security forces, which actually provide
national security. Why?

According to the OSA, military secerts are more sensitive -they invite
14 years., against 3 years for others.

Personnel of the exempted organisations cannot even ask for mundane
information concerning their pay, promotions etc, which a soldier can.
Is this not discrimination and violative of Art 14 of the
Constitution?

Maj Gen VK Singh (Retd)
9873494521

On 10/03/2012, Hari Goyal <rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Rajeev Kumar,
>
> You have made a good suggestion. For going to the Court, is there any
> organization who is ready to help the common man honestly and at affordable
> charges. On the basis of my experience in Delhi, a majority of advocates are
> dishonest and Bar Council is not prepared to take action against whom you
> make a complaint. Advocates take full fee in advance and then don't appear
> in the court. Even they refuse to return your papers/case files to make your
> suffer financially.
> I shall appreciate if you have any suggestion against this
> corruption/cheating ?
>
> Dr. Hari Dev Goyal
> Indian Economic Service (1968 Batch)
> rtidwarka@yahoo.co.in
> 10.03.2012
>
>
> --- On Wed, 29/2/12, rajeev kumar <yadavrajeev_2005@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
>
> From: rajeev kumar <yadavrajeev_2005@yahoo.co.in>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, 29 February, 2012, 10:43 PM
>
> RTI is toothless act and it is strange what you expect from it. Best thing
> is to approach court.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajeev Yadav,
>
> National President,
>
> (B.Sc., M.B.A., L.L.B., P.G.D. Human Rights),
>
> Adhikaar the rights path,
>
> +919811242471.
>
> www.adhikaar.in
>
> .
>
> --- On Mon, 27/2/12, Sandeep gupta <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Sandeep gupta <drsandgupta@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Monday, 27 February, 2012, 4:52 AM
>
> I had filed a complaint in august 2010 related to no reply from
> petroleum ministry related to information demanded on section 4. when
> i filed rti as to ask the action taken, it was decided on feb 15 with
> issuance of notice. many of the cases filed by in may 2011 (IC-SS) are
> yet to be heard.
> i had filed many cases in feb 2011 related to bsnl (MLS). all except
> one are yet to be heard.
> I had filed many cases related to income tax department, CBDT in
> november 2011. all are yet to be heard.
> even there is no
> mention on the cic website about cases filed against
> bsnl, income tax
>
> On 2/26/12, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear members
>>
>> I have just had a PRIVATE chat with some people authorised to speak on
>> behalf of CIC (I am fighting them in a case before SC)
>>
>> 1) The actual outstanding pendency in the CIC is only around 2,700
>> cases (data wef Jan/Feb 2012)
>>
>> 2) The biggest culprit in terms of cases stuck is IC(Shailesh Gandhi)
>> who has around 800-900 cases stuck with him, some from as far back as
>> July 2011. In comparison CIC(SM) is up to date with a a pendency of
>> around 40-50 days.
>>
>> 3) No. 2 in terms of delay is IC(AD).
>>
>> 4) Whereas the CIC website reflects that around 27,000 cases are
>> pending, there is some computer glitch and
> the figure has been
>> multiplied by 10 due to file movement and poor dak records..
>>
>> I have no comments on these statements. My dear readers are encouraged
>> to  share their views.to the list.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>
>
> --
> Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta
> 1778, Sector 14, Hisar-125001, INDIA
> Phone: 91-99929-31181
>

No comments:

Post a Comment