Hello,
30 days are getting over, for this RTI application.
What is the outcome of this application? Information provided, refused or not replied?
regards,
-Joshi
On 23 April 2012 10:14, Sarbajit Roy <mail.sarbajitroy@gmail.com> wrote:
Copy of an RTI I have filed to Supreme Court today.
To:
Mrs. Smita Vats Sharma
Additional Registrar/
Central Public Information Officer
Supreme Court of India, New Delhi.
Tel. No.23073580/ Fax No.23384533
e-mail:supremecourt@nic.in
Date 23-April-2012
BY EMAIL:
Sub: Application / Request for Information u/s 6 of The Right to
Information Act 2005
Respected Madam,
I am caused to address this RTI request for information to you in the
larger public interest concerning certain scandalous statements and
obscene videos being circulated in the online media concerning
appointment of Judges to the Superior Courts with approval of the Most
Hon'ble Chief Justice of India.
At the outset, let me state that I am not accompanying the RTI
application fee of Rs.10 since it has been previously clarified to me
by you (and confirmed in Appeal by the Ld. Registrar Mr. Sunil Thomas)
that the said fee has not been "prescribed" by a notification in the
gazette. If the situation has changed in the meantime after I pointed
this out, I am always ready and willing to deposit the same so that my
application is not deficient in any way.
The Information requested by me is as follows:-
1) All "information" (as defined in RTI Act) which is (a) maintained,
or (b) accessible to, or (c) held by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of
India or his Office concerning the consideration of one Advocate Ms.
Anusuya Salwan, or suchlike, for appointment and/or elevation as a
Judge of the Delhi High Court. NB: If the same has been weeded out, a
copy instead of the weeding out order(s)may be provided to me.
2) A true copy of the videographic information, if any, which caused
the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India to return the proposal for
appointment of Ms. Anusuya Salwan as a Judge of the Delhi High Court
and/or the Supreme Court..
3) A copy of the letter from Ms. Meenakshi Arora , Sr. Advocate,
withdrawing her consent for consideration for appointment as a Judge.
It is pertinent to mention that I am filing this RTI request very
reluctantly and with the utmost regard and respect for this Hon'ble
Court where I am a litigant appearing in person.. My cause of action
is an obscene video allegedly featuring 2 prominent advocates
indulging in unnatural sexual acts in consideration for this judgeship
which is being circulated over the internet over a notorious
international pirate website which has defied all efforts to shut it
down. The details of the obscene video are given below.immediately
under my own particulars, and considering its contents I suggest it be
opened, if at all, by a person of the male gender as it is sure to
offend the tender sensibilities of the female gender..
Yours sincerely
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 011-2433-4262
Video details.
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/7198956/Abhishek_Manu_Singhvi_CD_Real_Copy
INFO HASH EA286A5CE25DBEB570B7B0EE244125420B46F279
Description:
"Real Scandal Image of Abhishek Manu Singhvi (Congressmen ) India.
Chair person of Standing committee in Indian Parliament asked to have
sex with him and for her service he will help her to get promotion.
that lady later on appointed as Judge in Supreme court."
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
No comments:
Post a Comment