Re: [HumJanenge] My Pending Public Grievance Petitions

How many peoples knows the Companies Act ? whether information on how to get the information as per provisions of Companies Act is published in the local language? Whether such information is esaily accessible to ordinary citizen who is illiterate Where the network used is very slowly can you assure that by using such inter one can easily download requested information? In many areas where there is accute electricity is it possible to use internet? Why the courts are not applying rule of harmonious interpretation when aim of both the laws is same to provide information why the courts are wasting the time whether law will be repealed or not if both laws can survive and only question is under which law information is given the simle answer is the law under which an applicant submits his under the provisions the information must given the courts are not willing to implement the law and judgment attached shows that judiciry dont want ordinary citizens right to information the judgment is proof coorupt mind set of judicary towards the rights of ordinary peoples of india. viadya --- On Tue, 10/7/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] My Pending Public Grievance Petitions To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Tuesday, 10 July, 2012, 12:34 PM To: Ms. Anuradha Chagti Director-RTI/DoPT 10-July-2012 Dear Madam I refer to my 3 public grievance petitions which are pending with yourself. Their CPGRMS registration numbers are DOPAT/E/2012/00352, 00353 and 00354 respectively. These are all connected with the a) anti-national b) corrupt, actions of Information Commissioner Mr Shailesh Gandhi Despite the fact that my petitions were received and registered on 3-May-2012 and forwarded to you for action by 20-June-2012, I have not received any communication (leave alone the mandatory interim reply) within the prescribed period of 2 months to resolve the grievance. I apprehend that the delay has taken place so as to avoid initiating prosecution under the Official Secrets Act against Mr.Shailesh Gandhi who enjoys tremendous political patronage (and which got him appointed as Information Commissioner despite his incompetence / ineligibility for the post). My view is recently confirmed by the Delhi High Court in WP(C) 11271/2009 available at http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/VS/judgement/06-06-2012/VS01062012CW112712009.pdf The Hon'ble Court has passed extremely scathing observations about Mr. Shailesh Gandhi's functioning as an Information Commissioner while appreciating the on-point decisions of Mr. A.N.Tiwari-ji who was previously Secretary/DoPT and the architect of the RTI Act. I would therefore request you to act immediately on my pending public grievance petitions and initiate prosecution /action against Mr. Shailesh Gandhi, and also stop his pension (and other post retirement benefits), if any. It may be recalled that Mr.Gandhi has publicly stated before accepting office that he would only take Rs.1 per month token salary, so it is not clear to the citizens why he is getting a pension now. Kindly note that the unexplained delay in acting on my petitions are completely unacceptable as they allowed Mr. Gandhi to carry on in his post till his tenure, which I find highly suspicious and deserving of inquiry. With best wishes, Yours faithfully Sarbajit Roy New Delhi