Saturday, July 14, 2012

Re: [rti_india] Re: Fwd: State CIC aims to dispose of 550 appeals per month .... TOI 12 Jul pg 7

 

Gentlemen
 
An important factor which keeps fuelling pendency keeps getting ignored. The nexus off judge/ solicitor and politician ensures that cases keep getting deferred for no explainable reason. I am personally involved in two cases in DHC for 4 years now and despite over 60 dates not even 15 mins of argument. The system has wasted not only litigants money but also that of the legal teams and its own – some other case could have been heard. There is no reason why cases cannot be heard and disposed off in a time bound manner. This will arrest pendency as well as act as a deterrent against futile attempts at frustrating litigants and denying justice.
 
If systemic faults are addressed pendency will come down and requirement for more judges will also come down. An important requirement here is judicial accountability and performance monitoring. Judges who do not act in public interest have no business to carry on and even get elevated.
 
 
Anant Trivedi
Ceng MBCS CITP
 
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 09:56
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: Fwd: State CIC aims to dispose of 550 appeals per month .... TOI 12 Jul pg 7
 
 

Friend,
We generally don't follow how many are penalized. Our iorgnaistion gives much importance for disposals then the penalties.

That is our way of working.
Bhaskar


On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Sharad Phadke <sharadphadke41@yahoo.in> wrote:
 
CIC to dispose 500 appeal and already disposed 400 per month.
 
How many PIO's penalized? Any idea?
 
Or section 18 is wound up in decisions?
 
Sharad Phadke



--
Yours in service of RTI

Bhaskar Prabhu
Mahiti Adhikar Manch
9892102424

www.facebook.com/mahitiadhikarmanch







__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment