Hello gentlemen;
I would like to join in in this conversation, if i may. I firstly object to Mr Tewari's line of thinking, but that is proably because he doesn't know sanjay. We've all watched him grow up before our eyes. Being the child of such luminaries, mistakes happen with all of us, in teenage, when growing up.
I personally think was moved to read the papers today, and wish Sanjay would be forgiven and given a new lease of life. He has endeared himself, and made a personal life for himself. Sunil Dutt G requested the people of India to treat him kindly.
Moreover, I very much fear, that the vested interests will ensure that he has a very bad time in the jail, as it is he is seen to be suffering. It is not easy to tear open your heart to the world.
I fear that the World Bank will recruit him, as they do all their agents, who have jail terms. They will ply him, and use him, on India. This is a very serious concern, as he has a great history behind him, having besides his parents, played Munnabhai.a contemporary Indian.
There is a national collective weightage there. I fear to my bones for him, as the winds : as we are discussing and are aware, are bad.
What do you think? Plse Plse tell me that I am wrong.
Pushpa j Vijula
read apology of an economic hit man and learn more.
--- On Fri, 29/3/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Shanti Bhushan in Sanjay Dutt's Defence !
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Date: Friday, 29 March, 2013, 1:55 AM
Dear Naveen Shri Shanti Bhushan has laid down the LAW. You can argue with Mr. Bhushan but you cannot argue with the LAW. If the State fails to protect a person, he is in his rights to acquire ALL MEANS REQUIRED TO DEFEND HIS LIFE Mr,. Bhushan ECHOES IAC when we stand for right to bear arms freely and defend ourselves. Mr. Bhushan's legal basis is IDENTICAL with IAC's because IPC is a 150 year old law almost as old as IAC (or Mr. Bhushan) Sarbajit On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:36 PM, naveen tewari <nct.lko@gmail.com> wrote: Dear All,
Shanti Bhushan has certainly gone beyond senility and is showing signs of Dementia. His long article in the Hindu of 26th march is the latest example of that. Here he is with all his remnant legal acumen misplaced to the hilt, arguing for a summary reprieve for Sanjay Dutt. In this venture mr. Bhushan quoted the judgment of the supreme court wherein the court has mentioned that Sanjay Dutt's reason for possessing those prohibited guns and arsenal was self defence. Mr. Bhushan argues that it is not a crime to defend oneself even if the ammunition possessed by one is without licence.
What a wonderful logic by this legal luminary who was once our Law Minister. I can only feel ashamed as an Indian that people of such calibre find there way to top positions in the country where they can play with the destiny of the people of this country. I am also deeply distressed that such people still manage to find a place in the public discourse no matter what level of atrophy their brain has reached.
The Hindu, my most favourite newspaper, is also springing surprises like these every now and then.
I request you all to read this article by Shanti Bhushan and react to it.
regards
naveen tewari
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
No comments:
Post a Comment