from: Ravindran P M raviforjustice@gmail.com
to: chiefsecy@kerala.gov.in
cc: chiefminister@kerala.gov.in, cm-grccell@kerala.gov.in
date: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:08 AM
subject: Right to Service Act-framing rules-suggestions
This suggestion is based on a report in the Malayala Manorama of 28 Jul 2012 that Ms Nivedita P Haran, Additional Chief Secretary is heading a committee to draft the rules for the Right to Service Act.
From what I understand about this Act as reported in the media, there is a loaded condition for getting the services under this Act- that is 'if the application is complete in all respects....'. Now what makes this loaded against the citizen is that even now the major hurdle faced by citizens is the number of times he is made to visit the service provider due to flimsy observations made each time- like the i not being dotted the first time, and the t not being crossed the second time and so on until the citizen applicant is forced to grease palms. And if the palm is greased none of these or even graver shortcomings are taken cognisance of.
Hence the following suggestion is made for consideration by the Committee.
Every application should be received and receipt acknowledged. The service provider should intimate all the deficiencies to the applicant in the receipt itself. The applicant should be allowed to resubmit the application after correcting all these deficiencies immediately or submit a fresh application later with all these deficiencies corrected, without any
additional fees.
Provided that the applicant will not be held responsible for any deficiencies in the original application that had not been indicated to the applicant and hence remain uncorrected.
Yours truly
ravi
The use of utterly foul language deserves strongest condemnation.Sukla--On 31 May 2013 17:16, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Sir,
I am sure that Mr. Modi (who is now also a well known RTI consultant) had sufficient and strong reason to use the language he did.
I would, however, request Mr Modi, on behalf of the entire RTI community and the people of India, to kindly atone for his "sin" by following up with the Speakers of the Rajya Sabha and the Lok Sabha to ensure the following under RTI
1) That the most recent book (running into 900+ pages) titled as "Unparliamentary Expressions" be put into public domain immediately - over internet, if it has not already done.
2) That all MPs be made to pass a compulsory written test on Parliamentary language before being admitted to the House(s)
http://www.parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/bulletin2/2k/31072k.html
"No. 1115Unparliamentary Expressions
Members are informed that an updated compilation entitled 'Unparliamentary Expressions' has been brought out by the Lok Sabha Secretariat.
The compilation contains references to words and expressions declared unparliamentary in the Central Legislative Assembly, Constituent Assembly of India (Legislative), Provisional Parliament, First to Tenth Lok Sabhas (1952 to 1995), Rajya Sabha, State Legislatures in India and some of the Commonwealth Parliaments including the British House of Commons.
The compilation is priced at Rs.1160/-. However, a rebate of 25 percent will be allowed to Members of Parliament on purchase of only one copy each for his/her personal use.
The copies are available for sale at the Sale Counter, Reception Office, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Parliament House, New Delhi. "On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Praveen Kumar <praveen.kumar@jindalsteel.com> wrote:
It is shame on us to be associated with the group , what is the character Mr. Modi himself has portrayed using the language . Shameful for all the people associated with the group ,how can they lead the change ?.
Regards
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of pavan nair
Sent: 31 May 2013 14:20
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Aruna Roy bidding goodbye to NAC
What about the bitch part? Senior journalist or whatever, Modi should apologise. Pavan Nair
On 31 May 2013 14:08, "Sarbajit Roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Ketan
(offered in deference to your status as senior journalist)
"pimp" ??? perhaps you meant,
"bawd" (A woman in charge of a brothel)
"procuress" (A female who obtains a woman as a prostitute for another person.)
SarbajitOn Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ketan Modi <modiketan@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good riddance,
> The bitch had misused her official position to kill/dilute the provisions of RT...
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Peace Is Doable
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
--
No comments:
Post a Comment