Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] AAM AADMI PARTY'S STRANGE QUERIES

Thank you Dr. Rakesh Ranjan to clarify to Mr. sheshadri and many others creating misunderstanding 


On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:45 PM, rakesh ranjan <rakesh_eia@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Mr. M.N.Seshadri,
I salute your enthusiasm in favour of Kejriwal, without entering into the merits and demerits of this man. The purpose of writing this comment is to advise you correction in two vital misunderstandings:
1. At no point of time Congress and BJP has offered unconditional support to AAP, its a media's creation. There is not even a piece of paper in hands of Kejriwal, based upon which he could claim that congress has offered him unconditional support. As a matter of fact Congress only communicated the Lt. Governor that they are willing to support AAP from outside to prevent another poll; which far away from unconditional support in terms of 'constitutional law'. Therefore kindly correct it in future posts and communications. The blunder you are committing  about  taking the name of BJP; which at no point offered any support to AAP nor to the Lt. Governor; at the most you can quote the remark of Dr. Harshvardhan about 'constructive support' to AAP; which is again not a support in forming the government at all. For instance the Communist parties had offered 'constructive support' to the government of Mr. A.B. Bajpai. therefore it would be better for you to refrain from false propaganda of offering unconditional support. As such there is nothing like "unconditional support" in parliamentary democracy. In the history of Indian Parliamentary democracy this term was pioneered by Mr. Lalu Prashad Yadav while supporting the UPA - II government. 

2. The second aspect which annoyingly indicates that you are not aware of abc of governance in Delhi and the politics within the state of Delhi, is confirmed by your remark about Delhi Police. (a) not even a single constable/officer in Delhi Police has waist 55". (b) Even if they have a waist 55" or say 75"; Kejriwal as Chief Minister could not do any this about this because of the simple fact that "Delhi Police" is not a part of Delhi State and its not bound to take commands from CM, but it functions directly under Home Ministry of Government of India. There is no role of State CM in working management and practically any affair of Delhi Police, as per the Delhi Police Act 1978.

Hope you correct your understanding about both the issues and refrain from posting comments, remarks and views based on assumptions, which are fundamentally wrong. I also hope you would not take it personal since my comment endeavors constructive improvement in the process of public communication and dialogues.   

Kind Regards

Dr. Rakesh Ranjan 


On Monday, 16 December 2013, 16:11, M.N.Seshadri <manavasi.seshadri@gmail.com> wrote:
It appears khejriwal is nervous. What prevents him from seeking  advice from eminent citizens who are not interested in politics and not fond of power . There should be many financial experts and retired administrators who would be willing to help without expecting any wages as most of these retired personnel are quite well off with comfortable pension and all their kids well settled, at the same time  fed with the culture and  conduct of our present day politicians .Khejriwal has the mandate with unconditional support of Congress and BJP in Delhi will not dare to bung in the monkey wrench  for fear of losing every thing in 2014 .
What exactly AAP means by declaring  that they will consult the people?  They have already voted for the party . BJP and Congress cannot possibly block any of the 18 points in the agenda. If they even try to do so people will teach these  parties a lesson which they cannot possibly forget !!
Come on  I request my friends to put some sense in to AAP and tell them to get on with the JOB. If he succeeds even 20 % in reducing corruption particularly at the high levels and take swift action to deal with small time police and  state govt employees who  have been making BLACK money merrily  with majority of policemen with 55 inch waistline. First The youngsters of AAP should insist on fit police men. . Just imagine our soldiers with POT BELLIES !! They will not be able to crawl in a battle .
Even if AAP indicates action towards fulfilling their 18 point program AAM ADMI will understand even if AAP does not succeed immediately .ON 29 Dec LOKAYUKTA BILL BASED ON JAN LOK PAL SHOULD BE PASSED. Political parties resisting such move can only  do so at their PERIL .  Seshadri  
 
From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Veerendra Jaitly
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:15 AM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] AAM AADMI PARTY'S STRANGE QUERIES
 
AAP should demonstrate action now.
No more discussions.
And taking the opinion of 270 Municipal Wards through Jan Sabhas is a crazy idea before every important decision.
By now they should know what people want. If they don't know, then it means they never did any active listening to the Aam Admi. It was just a Shosha.
People want action. People want development. They want an end to their day to day problems and as the party in power, Aap should assume power and get on the job. Any more excuses by them will mean their insincerity. They have the numbers with them with Congress support. 
With Lok Sabha elections round the corner, no party would like Aap Govt to fall and invite public wrath.
 
 
With Warm Regards,
 
Veerendra K Jaitly
09811777904
C_cube Consultants
101/2 Beverly Park, Plot-2
Sector 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 
 
 
 
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
To
 
India Against Corruption
 
                            AAM  AADMI PARTY'S  STRANGE QUERIES
BJP  cannot form government in Delhi , since  Aam  Aadmi party refused to extend issue based support.  However, Aam Aadmi party can form government ,since both BJP and Congress have extended issue based support.
Now,  it appears that Aam Aadmi party  tries to wriggle out of   forming government,  by asking BJP and Congress to clarify whether it would extend support for a few particular specific issues as a pre condition.  This question would be logical in case of coalition government,  where different parties join together with minimum action plans.
In the present case, both BJP and Congress would sit in opposition and therefore,  they would be logical in saying that they would extend support depending on performance of the ruling party and based on issues. If Aam  Aadmi party would be confident of its programmes and implement them in honest way, it is bound to get support from the people and the opposition parties would hesitate to oppose for the sake of opposition, particularly fearing rout in the next elections.
Many suspect that Aam Aadmi party has  made nearly impossible  promises like reducing the electricity tariff etc. without understanding the ground realities such as increasing cost of power generation . It promised to pass Lokpal bill in Delhi assembly , ignoring the fact  that Lokpal bill is a Central subject involving  inter state implications.
Perhaps, the party fears that it would be exposed if it would form government.
 
N.S.Venkataraman
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
ASHOK KUMAR UPADHYAY
RESEARCH SCHOLAR IN CIVIL ENGG.
MOTILAL NEHRU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, ALLAHABAD 211004
INDIA
M- 9454590704
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)