Can i have the link & details of the Delhi high Court Order Since it is to be Cited in our high court which sought my objections for a Penalty of only Rs 2000/=
N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
On Monday, 9 December 2013 10:33 PM, Manoj Pai <manojpai@yahoo.com> wrote:
In the matter between Shri S.K. Jain, New Delhi V/s Delhi Transco Chief CIC Deepak Sandhu has awarded the applicant compensation for nine months delay in receiving the information. The order reads as "For the detriment and harassment caused to the appellant on account of this delay, Commission directs the public authority namely DTL to pay compensation of Rs. 3000/– to the appellant within one week of receipt of the order."
Full decision at this link
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_DS_A_2013_001281_T_121988.pdf
However, while going through the link, it is observed that the CIC has observed "Shri KG Vishwanathan, Manager (Finance)/PIO and Shri Vasu Dev, Manager (HRD)/PIO who appeared before the Commission in the same matter on 24 October 2013 and provided false and misleading information to the Commission". The decision further continues "This has wasted the time and resources of the public authority and the Commission and they are warned to be more careful in future."
It appears that the CIC has spared the CPIO from penalty for nine months delay, filing false reply before the Commission and wasting the time of the CIC. As such, the Delhi HC ruling comes into play = Penalty is mandatory.
Manoj
Full decision at this link
http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_DS_A_2013_001281_T_121988.pdf
However, while going through the link, it is observed that the CIC has observed "Shri KG Vishwanathan, Manager (Finance)/PIO and Shri Vasu Dev, Manager (HRD)/PIO who appeared before the Commission in the same matter on 24 October 2013 and provided false and misleading information to the Commission". The decision further continues "This has wasted the time and resources of the public authority and the Commission and they are warned to be more careful in future."
It appears that the CIC has spared the CPIO from penalty for nine months delay, filing false reply before the Commission and wasting the time of the CIC. As such, the Delhi HC ruling comes into play = Penalty is mandatory.
Manoj
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment