Re: [IAC#RG] Increasing cases of porn

Dear Supratim

1) IAC has not spoofed Sanjeev Sabhlok or spoofed SKC. Why should we
waste our time on such irrelevant fools and the cyber dramatics they
employ to promote themselves ?

2) In India ALL internet porn is (a) prohibited (b) NOT covered under
free speech. That is the legal position - not IAC's.

3) There is a huge lobby of foreign financed haramis working overtime
to align India's position on pornography with that of USA or Denmark.

4) Since you track telecom, you know well the ARPU hit on their
bottomlines if net-porn is actually stopped.

5) At the moment we are working to get the existing IT laws enforced
administratively. In other words requiring that the babu's
discretionary powers be uniformly applied.

Sarbajit

On 8/16/14, Supratim Basu <xsupratim@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sarbajit,
>
> This is kind of silly on the part of IAC, is it not - spoofing SKC to
> comment on Sanjeev? Why not directly use IAC or your own name to do so?
>
> And, while we could leave cows (murder? how about those fish?) and khaps to
> "morally confused people" including many on this particular list, what
> about your fight with porn?
>
> Isn't porn (except child porn) covered by free speech? Curious to know the
> IAC position.
>
> Thanks
>
> Supratim