Dear Ms. Sen
Of course it speaks for itself.. .. (without invention) .. The Hindu Code of 1955 which jawaharlal nehru imposed on India.
However, since the English language does not seem to be your strong suit, here goes
"Hindu" - Everybody who is not a Muslim, Christian, Jew, Parsi, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, Brahmo Samajist, Arya Samajist, Prarthana Samajist, Virashaiva, Lingayat, Scheduled Tribal, Renouncants of the Union territory of Pondicherry, &c &c.... (ie. the approx 30% remainder/dregs of the Indian population who are collectively known as the RSS)
"Code" - a collection of existing laws , scientifically arranged, and promulgated by legislative authority . A previous example of such a code of "Hindu" law is the "Manu Smriti" which the aforesaid Hindus desire to be reimposed on the non-Hindus.
"1955" - The year (1955-56) in which the 4 Acts of the aforesaid Nehruvian Code were effectively approved in Parliament
"Jawaharlal Nehru" - a "rose" between two "thorns" (also the idiot who believed his Chinese brothers would not attack India in 1962).
On 12/22/18, Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:
> 《"Hindu Code 1955" which Jawaharlal Nehru imposed on the people of India.》
>
> Dear Mr. Roy,
>
> I. That's a fragment from the very opening paragraph of your post to which
> I responded.
> Hope you'd recognise.
> Speaks for itself.
> A subsequent invention of "Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955" is just that - an
> invention.
>
> Il. Despite categorical rebuttal (ref.: <<Even without counting Sikhs,
> Buddhists, Jains as Hindus, as per the 2011 census, Hindus constitute
> approximately 80% of Indian population.>>), you've repeated:
> <<Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.>>
>
> That's ridiculous.
>
> The Census 2011 posits:
> Hindu 79.80 %
> Muslim 14.23 %
> Sikh 1.72 %
> Buddhist 0.70 %
> Jain 0.37 %
> Other Religion 0.66 %
> Not Stated 0.24 %
> Total 100%
> (Ref.: <https://www.census2011.co.in/religion.php>.)
>
> IV. That Rahul Gandhi did light the funeral pyre of his slain father had
> already been established.
> Consequently, the claim that he is a "practising Catholic" comes out as a
> mere (malicious?) hoax.
>
> Sukla
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 22:39 Sarbajit Roy <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> wrote:
> Dear Ms. Sen
>
> Just to update you, IACRG is not one of those cozy litte twitterati
> echo-chambers which exist in cyber space. We encourage healthy scholarly
> discussion here and those who are wrong on FACTS (including ourselves) must
> be exposed.
>
> Accordingly, this is issued as a public service communique to the Hindus of
> Hindustan to convey to them the truth about certain imposters masquerading
> as Hindus for cheap electoral gains through deceptions.
>
> 1. We never claimed there was a Hindu Code Act. Any schoolboy knows that
> the Ambedkar version of the Hindu Code Bill 1951 failed to muster support
> causing Nehru to pass it in pieces between 1955-56. Those 4 enactments are
> known today as Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955.
>
> 2. It is incorrect (in fact it is a gross mis-statement and insult to them)
> to say that Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists would be "counted" as Hindus after
> 1955. If you are capable of reading laws the ways they are meant to be
> read, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, and FOLLOWERS of the Brahmo Samaj, Arya
> Samaj and Prathana Samaj were only deemed to be covered/governed by Hindu
> Law. BTW: The legal significance of the term "followers of the ..." may
> have escaped you.
>
> 3. Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.
>
> 4. Insofar as Mr. Rahul Gandhi is concerned, the factum of his lighting his
> father's funeral pyre is completely irrelevant to his misrepresentations of
> himself as a Hindu Kaul Brahmin of Dattatreya gotra and descendant of Lord
> Parushrama etc etc.
>
> 5. Actually the only thing more ludicrous than Mr. Rahul Gandhi (INC
> President) saying he is a Hindu and Brahmin is Mr.Amit Shah's (BJP
> President) denying he is a Jain and claiming instead to be a "Hindu"
> Vaishnav. Now, We the Hindustani people of India have had enough of both
> these jumla artistes and their corrupt parties. ... a POX on both their
> houses.
>
>
>
> Amit Shah doing Jain worship.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:
Of course it speaks for itself.. .. (without invention) .. The Hindu Code of 1955 which jawaharlal nehru imposed on India.
However, since the English language does not seem to be your strong suit, here goes
"Hindu" - Everybody who is not a Muslim, Christian, Jew, Parsi, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, Brahmo Samajist, Arya Samajist, Prarthana Samajist, Virashaiva, Lingayat, Scheduled Tribal, Renouncants of the Union territory of Pondicherry, &c &c.... (ie. the approx 30% remainder/dregs of the Indian population who are collectively known as the RSS)
"Code" - a collection of existing laws , scientifically arranged, and promulgated by legislative authority . A previous example of such a code of "Hindu" law is the "Manu Smriti" which the aforesaid Hindus desire to be reimposed on the non-Hindus.
"1955" - The year (1955-56) in which the 4 Acts of the aforesaid Nehruvian Code were effectively approved in Parliament
"Jawaharlal Nehru" - a "rose" between two "thorns" (also the idiot who believed his Chinese brothers would not attack India in 1962).
On 12/22/18, Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:
> 《"Hindu Code 1955" which Jawaharlal Nehru imposed on the people of India.》
>
> Dear Mr. Roy,
>
> I. That's a fragment from the very opening paragraph of your post to which
> I responded.
> Hope you'd recognise.
> Speaks for itself.
> A subsequent invention of "Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955" is just that - an
> invention.
>
> Il. Despite categorical rebuttal (ref.: <<Even without counting Sikhs,
> Buddhists, Jains as Hindus, as per the 2011 census, Hindus constitute
> approximately 80% of Indian population.>>), you've repeated:
> <<Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.>>
>
> That's ridiculous.
>
> The Census 2011 posits:
> Hindu 79.80 %
> Muslim 14.23 %
> Sikh 1.72 %
> Buddhist 0.70 %
> Jain 0.37 %
> Other Religion 0.66 %
> Not Stated 0.24 %
> Total 100%
> (Ref.: <https://www.census2011.co.in/religion.php>.)
>
> IV. That Rahul Gandhi did light the funeral pyre of his slain father had
> already been established.
> Consequently, the claim that he is a "practising Catholic" comes out as a
> mere (malicious?) hoax.
>
> Sukla
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, 22:39 Sarbajit Roy <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> wrote:
> Dear Ms. Sen
>
> Just to update you, IACRG is not one of those cozy litte twitterati
> echo-chambers which exist in cyber space. We encourage healthy scholarly
> discussion here and those who are wrong on FACTS (including ourselves) must
> be exposed.
>
> Accordingly, this is issued as a public service communique to the Hindus of
> Hindustan to convey to them the truth about certain imposters masquerading
> as Hindus for cheap electoral gains through deceptions.
>
> 1. We never claimed there was a Hindu Code Act. Any schoolboy knows that
> the Ambedkar version of the Hindu Code Bill 1951 failed to muster support
> causing Nehru to pass it in pieces between 1955-56. Those 4 enactments are
> known today as Nehru's Hindu Code of 1955.
>
> 2. It is incorrect (in fact it is a gross mis-statement and insult to them)
> to say that Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists would be "counted" as Hindus after
> 1955. If you are capable of reading laws the ways they are meant to be
> read, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, and FOLLOWERS of the Brahmo Samaj, Arya
> Samaj and Prathana Samaj were only deemed to be covered/governed by Hindu
> Law. BTW: The legal significance of the term "followers of the ..." may
> have escaped you.
>
> 3. Today Hindus (as defined in the Hindu Code 1955) only constitute under
> 30% of the population of India.
>
> 4. Insofar as Mr. Rahul Gandhi is concerned, the factum of his lighting his
> father's funeral pyre is completely irrelevant to his misrepresentations of
> himself as a Hindu Kaul Brahmin of Dattatreya gotra and descendant of Lord
> Parushrama etc etc.
>
> 5. Actually the only thing more ludicrous than Mr. Rahul Gandhi (INC
> President) saying he is a Hindu and Brahmin is Mr.Amit Shah's (BJP
> President) denying he is a Jain and claiming instead to be a "Hindu"
> Vaishnav. Now, We the Hindustani people of India have had enough of both
> these jumla artistes and their corrupt parties. ... a POX on both their
> houses.
>
>
>
> Amit Shah doing Jain worship.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sukla Sen <sukla.sen@gmail.com> wrote:
No comments:
Post a Comment