Re: [HumJanenge] HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING BY MRS. A. DIXIT, IC

I do not think any hearing is needed on most of the applications made under RTI. But it is a fashion of the Officers and mainly CIC to conduct hearing as if they are running a criminal case. In fact the appeals are always self explanatory. The department can submit a para-wise reply and appellant can submit its re-joinder. Based on the rejoinder the CIC can take decision. Court also can follow such practice on application under RTI. Under exceptional cases only personal hearing should be entertained. CIC should justify the personal hearing as to why the personal hearing is not avoidable. shirish dave --- On Sat, 30/7/11, Janardhana Rao Magar <njrmagar@gmail.com> wrote: From: Janardhana Rao Magar <njrmagar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING BY MRS. A. DIXIT, IC To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, 30 July, 2011, 1:00 PM If the same is not in accordance to phone discussion ask in writing details of conversation and same is not correct than file complaint against IC before CIC    On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in> wrote: Sir, (1)can an IC force the applicant to decide the case by telephone hearing under the provisions of RTI Act.(2) does RTI Act provides for telephonic hearing. (3) if both are not allowed then what action can be taken against the IC for illegal act. beniwal 09958374781  --- On Fri, 29/7/11, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> Subject: [HumJanenge] HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING BY MRS. A. DIXIT, IC To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, 29 July, 2011, 5:18 AM Dear Shri Sharama, I appalaud your strong action.  Such action by more applicants are desired. For a long time, the charge of golden key to open the cup board of justice are being levelled by some activists.  I shall some questionable action and decisons in my case by Mrs. Dixit, IC shortly. They belong to her decision about pass port office and All India Radio Please do not circulate this pre-maturely. On Thu, 28/7/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> Subject: [HumJanenge] Fwd: HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING To: "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> Date: Thursday, 28 July, 2011, 9:00 PM ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mani Ram Sharma <maniramsharma@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:50 PM Subject: HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING To: CIC Ad <adixit@nic.in> Mani Ram Sharma, ADVOCATE                  Nakul Niwas, Behind Roadways Depot,                      Sardarshahar -331 403-7                  District: Churu ( Raj)                  Email: maniramsharma@gmail.com Dated: 28th  Jul, 2011       Smt. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, New Delhi   Madam,   HEARING IN CIC/SM/A/2011/000106:THROUGH AUDIO CONFERENCING     With reference to your revised notice dated 13.07.11 in the said cause I wish to request you that I have waited for the proposed hearing till 4.40 PM but no call has been received from your end. The matter was posted for hearing on 13.07.11 earlier and then adjourned for 28.07.11 at 4.00PM. It was advised that you have overstayed in the earlier hearing in Full Bench. I think there might be some powerful party involved in the said full bench case and more than sufficient opportunity had been afforded to that powerful party.    After all a call was received at about 6.10 PM for the purpose and the same was disconnected by you after a short hearing of 4 minutes.  You were found patient less in the frontline of defence of the respondent PIO Delhi High Court .While trying to call you from my cellphone the same was not attended by you. Though I have already submitted my submission per email.   Please recapitulate that my three cases against PIO Supreme Court were scheduled for hearing on 18.07.11 and a time of 15 minutes (total 45 minutes) was allotted (transcript of audio is enclosed for your ready reference and recapitulation) for each of the case but you were in very hurry to hear the cases and allowed only total time of 17 minutes to all the cases.  All this gives message to the citizens that lock of the wardrobe of justice in Central Information Commission can be opened with a golden key only. This unearths the dualistic and masqueraded role of Commission.       Yours truly   (Mani Ram Sharma)