The exercise would have been an interesting one, otherwise, and more importantly fun.
Manoj
From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
1) If 2 PSUs come together to create a JV, the child PSU (even if 100%
owned by these PSUs) is not a PA in terms of definition of PA in RTI
ACT UNLESS there is an order / notfn etc. of APPROPRIATE GOVT
establishing / constituting this entity.
2) There is something fishy about Mr Kaushis's friend's case. It must
have taken considerable effort for his friend to run up so many unpaid
dues while "waiting" for statutory notices to be served on him. What
was he doing all this time ??
Sarbajit
Pity you let the cat out of the bag, a bit too soon, Sarbajit :-)
Manoj
From: sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
1) If 2 PSUs come together to create a JV, the child PSU (even if 100%
owned by these PSUs) is not a PA in terms of definition of PA in RTI
ACT UNLESS there is an order / notfn etc. of APPROPRIATE GOVT
establishing / constituting this entity.
2) There is something fishy about Mr Kaushis's friend's case. It must
have taken considerable effort for his friend to run up so many unpaid
dues while "waiting" for statutory notices to be served on him. What
was he doing all this time ??
Sarbajit
No comments:
Post a Comment