Re: [HumJanenge] NGO "Haramis"

Will remain highly obliged to the esteemed members of thee forum.

Can we say,at the end of the day,what's it that we've gained,or contributed?

Its possible to answer in generalities and in the specific.

Lets now look at the specifics.

Brilliant people like Sh S Roy could indicate just a few MOST CORRUPT MINISTRIES/DEPARTMENTS/ORGANISATIONS,which need closer scrutiny through RTI.

Certain general templates could be created for use of different members for eliciting information that could ten be followed up in appropriate manner(including PIL).

Why these organisations are not complying with provisions of sec 4 of the Act in letter and spirit could be discerned.

Where the discretion has been misused/abused could be ascertained.

Where the normal rules and regulations are seen to be flouted with impunity could be found out.

Where unnecessary expenditure is getting incurred(definitely not in public interest) could be known.

               This is just a small sample.

We can silently,yet surely defeat the evil designs of those perverting the processes of democracy,and disallowing the nation to reach its potential.

                                     And ,of course,wherever there're legal hurdles our legal luminaries/Sh Roy included, could be greatly helpful.

                            However enjoyable the stray discussions/deliberations may look,the temptations have to be resisted,to work with full focus and dogged determination.

                         That's how we'll gain and contribute.That's how we'll feel blessed.

spm 

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Sant Mathur <santmathur@gmail.com> wrote:

TWO WRONGS DON'T A RIGHT MAKE.

Pl listen to saintly/sober advice.

A fallacy is a defect in argument,and its multiple use, to prove a point, is of no avail.Adding zeroes to zeroes will never create any sum/substance.

Kindly agree to keep our forum decent.Even under worst provocations MKG never used swear words.He managed to get results nevertheless.So can we.

spm

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

V must learn from this mature advice and should not repeat the mistakes of Har*** and Bas****.  V R part of a civilized work and not in the primitive age.

---

From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 7 October 2011 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] NGO "Haramis"

Dear Devinder ji

Your mature advice is surely an inspiration for all of us.

Respectfully

Sarbajit

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, devinder chopra <ddchop47@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Shri Sarabjit Roy Ji:

  This is one of the rarest emailed response I have attempted to
share. That too in my 77 th year that I have been blessed with having
originally come to Delhi via Mussoorie, in 1947, from Lahore where I
was born. (The parasitical growth of the previous few centuries broke
our land into three entities but under two flags -- and now THREE!)

In Punjab or even in the rest of our country the word which begins
with H is not used in very good company -- regardless how effective it
may be in its force and impact.
Kiran ji has made an excellent suggestion-- "parasites and
parasitical" conveys in a more gentlemanly way than that which begins
with H.

With respect and best regards
Sincerely said
dev chopra -- UN Retiree
***

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM, kiran shaheen <kiranshaheen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then directly call them 'Parasites' . If a king keeps a 'Harem' , women are
> mostly passive carriers of his children and does not hold any ownership
> actually. I echo your sentiments and sometimes we use such words in personal
> conversation too but continuously using a particular word on a public
> platform is not advisable in my views.
>  Let us start putting the points straight in political terms which is more
> hard hitting and educative for us all.
>  Warmly,
> Kiran
>