Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal.

all ex babus will continuing doing what they have been doing- delay/deny the info, what they were doing before getting resettled as ICs, but now  with more power and less accountability. we will see in coming  days  more and more commissions being formed  for retiring Babus and Judges to continue the free loot. beniwal --- On Sat, 3/3/12, Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> wrote: From: Vikram Simha <vikramsimha54@yahoo.co.in> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal. To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Saturday, 3 March, 2012, 12:01 AM Why manual counting seems a ridiculous excersise  Dont they have Certain Programme to Maintain such . E Governance . and if One ICs has More Pending why not Shift or reallocate the Dept /State /Ministry ? Of course My Moot question THREE MORE WHITE ELEPANTS and the One From Blore Retd also on 1/03/2012  therefore No COOLING PERIOD  Reason : not yet Known , One may be to Coverup OTS --- One time settlement an Free Opnion offered from another Banker(Mr kini) to me today over telephone . One More question to me "any order on One time settlements" whether they are also in Shelter clause (sec 8) Well obviously Fidicuiary capacity(sic)? N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte & RTI Study Center , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Fri, 2/3/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] No delay at CIC. 45 days to hearing/disposal. > To: "Nidhi Sharma" <nidhi2479@gmail.com>, "humjanenge" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com> > Date: Friday, 2 March, 2012, 10:44 PM > Dear Nidhi (and group) > > After my email post to the HJ list specifying that IC(AD) > was #2 > defaulter,  the CIC has been stung into action. > IC(AD)'s registry has > published their pending cases on CIC's website. She claims > to have > only 220 Appeals and 150 Complaints pending (ie. about half > of what > .IC(SG)'s outstanding is). > > So it is quite obvious that of the known pendency of the CIC > (and > which we must assume to be true), IC-SG is the worst > offender in terms > of pendency at around 850 cases, and even assuming that teh > remaining > 5 ICs had an average of 400 cases each (avg. of CIC + AD) > then this > works out to 2,000 cases which is almost exactly equal to > the info > given to me of "around 2,700" pending cases only. > > Satyanand's Mishra's own figures damn him. WHY THEN DO WE > NEED THESE 3 > EXTRA ICs ? Is it because of all those paid holidays they > now get for > study tours / junkets to New Zealand and Scandanavia where a > certain > MNC financed NGO is hosting them. ?? > > Sarbajit > > Sarbajit > > > > > > > On 2/27/12, Nidhi Sharma <nidhi2479@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Dear Sarbajit > > > > I met Mr Satyanand Mishra last week. He stands by the > 20,000+ figure. He > > says that is the real pendency with CIC. He has now > asked all registries > > (ICs) to manually count every case pending with them > and file a return by > > the end of this week so that he can actually react to > the media reports. > > > > nidhi > > >