Re: [IAC#RG] Shanti Bhushan in Sanjay Dutt's Defence !

At the moment the India nation is faced with a situation where each and every one of its fundamental pillars is absolutely and completely corrupt. It would be foolish to place faith in any of the institutions

If India is at all surviving, it is because of its professional class, doctors, engineers, pilots, farmers, private initiative etc who are somehow holding the raft of this nation together in an ocean of corruption while the govt takes credit.

India's public sector cannot manufacture anything, and even if they can manufacture it no outside buyer wants it unless we give it to them free - the internal buyers don't want it even if  it is given free. (useless things like condoms or Arjuna battle tank or Tejas )

There is no difference between Sanjay Dutt and Pragya Singh Thakur - they should both be hanged as fast as possible for their crimes against the State.

Sarbajit

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Anamika R <anamikaiac@gmail.com> wrote:

As a nation we are always barking up the wrong tree because we are led to do so.

Agreed that the Sanjay Dutt issue is inconsequential if it is seen in the right perspective.

But in the larger context, it sets a dangerous precedent for criminal jurisdiction.

On one hand you have a Pragya Thakur who is languishing in jail whether for good one doesn't know and without any Katju, etc., support, and on the other hand you have 'an inconsequential issue holder' getting so much sympathy and media attention.

For me, we have an active judiciary and like we accept all the nonsense that goes in the name of politics, we should learn to accept the judiciary as well, for better or for worse.

Sent from my iPad