Sunday, July 27, 2014

Re: [IAC#RG] SUPREME COURT CRYING FOR JUSTICE

There is nothing like judicial independence. It is only a myth created for the consumption of the gullible public. One judge who was appointed as Lokayuktha in Gujarat and refused to take up the job said it explicitly: when I am being appointed against the will of the state govt it will not be possible for me to work freely. There will be resource crunch and all inconveniences will be created for the performance of the duties'. And that is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!

That is why you find that when the judiciary gives a judgement in favor of ordinary citizens and the government fails to implement it no action is taken against the defaulters whereas ordinary citizens are subject to immense pressure not to criticize judges under threat of contempt of court!

regards n bw

ravi


On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Dinesh Verma <dcverma06@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all readers who are expressing views about Independence of Judiciary & for Fast Justice.
Presently view of political thinkers are that Collegium system for appointment of Supreme Court & High Court Judges be 
stopped even if Constitutional amendment is required.
Disclosure by  Supreme Court Judge, Justice ( Retd) Katju about political influence has created a stir among the citizens 
who are interested in keeping the Judiciary out of bounds of political interference at any stage.Justice Katju's disclosure has
 found support from former Judges also.
Judicial independence has been appreciated by all in general.People have expressed their faith in Judiciary.
The Collegium system is working after 1993 & 1998 Judgement.The disclosure by Justice Katju is about interference 
& its effect is of a much latter date.Thus the interference was indirect when there was no political say in appointment of Judges.
In case the proposal as mooted, wherein political persons would also be in the committee of selection of Judges ,is 
given effect, there will be direct involvement of politicians.Persons aspiring for such appointment may prefer to come closure to 
the political person in authority.
We cannot forget a call given by a political party for Committed Judiciary & its effect .
I wold like the readers to express their views with reasons, be it for or against, the view expressed by me.
D.C.Verma




On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:47 PM, <santmathur@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sureshanji, cd u mind pl sharing your contact details? Larger issies,yet specific to judiciary alone, need to be discussed. Thanks. S P Mathur IPS DGP(retd) BE MBA PhD
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

-----Original Message-----

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M Ravindran
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)