1) If a matter is admitted by the SC they almost invariably pass a
reasoned order.
2) Many a times matters are not admitted and disposed off at the
thresh hold. At such time there is no need to go into the law.
The PRIME problem with Indian courts is LITIGANTS. ... POOR QUALITY
LITIGANTS who have no business being in the courts in the first place.
Everything else (corrupt lawyers, corrupt judges, endemic delays,
corrupt registries etc etc flows from this )
Having been a veteran of pleading my own case in courts for almost 30
years now ("from traffic court to Supreme Court) I can say truthfully
that there is a great change taking place in the Courts BUT what to do
about POOR QUALITY LITIGANTS who only want to ABUSE THE LEGAL PROCESS
and cause GREAT DELAY.
Sarbajit
On Jul 15, 6:41 am, capt beniwal <trident...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Even supreme court judges do what you have said. Many of them are Law to themselves and DO NOT give any reason as to under whic law the case is decided.
>
> --- On Fri, 15/7/11, Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kap...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Vijay Kapoor <vijay99kap...@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] delay in courts
> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
> Date: Friday, 15 July, 2011, 5:14 AM
>
> There are still other (Shocking) reasons for delays in courts. Yes, it is the "honble" "judges" themselves.
> I have limited but sad direct experience of courts and "judges." Most of the "judges" themselseves go against the law. For instance, the Consumer Protection Act suggests that a non-complicated case should be disposed off in about 5 months, and that ordinarily no adjournment should be allowed, and if any is allowed, the reasons should be recorded in writing and costs of at least Rs. 500 should be awarded. However, most cases drag on for years, because the "judges" allow multiple adjournments on the flimsiest of grounds, without recording reasons in writing, and without allowing costs contrary to law.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment