My email of 21.03.2011 is safely preserved.
What is very interesting is that the 2 spies / touts I complained
about in 2011 are the very same people who are running to the
media today complaining loudly about the file having gone missing.
My email of 21.03.2011 also ensure that the NAC
recommendations (other than 500 words / 1 subject) were thrown
out by DoPT, whereas the ones you and I worked on at
www.humjanenge.org.in were mostly accepted. Thanks for
for your kind review then of my hasty drafting.
Sarbajit
OM ! Brahmakripahikevalam
On 8/25/12, Baby Varkey <babyjohn.varkey@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Dear Mr Sarbajit**
> *
> *EXCELLENT !*
> *
> *It is clear as a bell that folder was "misplaced" because of your
> Confidential Email.*
> *
> *B.J Varkey, Adv*
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To:
>> 1) Shri P.K.Misra, Secretary/DoPT,
>> 2) Shri Manoj Joshi, JS(ATA)/DoPT
>>
>> BY EMAIL
>>
>> Date: 25-August-2012
>>
>> Dear Sirs,
>>
>> I refer to reply given to Rajya Sabha by Hon'ble MoS on or about
>> 23.Aug.2012 concerning the subject, as reported by PTI as follows:
>>
>>
>> http://www.business-standard.com/generalnews/news/file-related-to-suggestionsrti-rules-was-misplaced-govt/47311/
>>
>> "File related to suggestions on RTI rules was misplaced: Govt
>> Press Trust of India / New Delhi August 23, 2012, 17:20
>>
>> The file related to suggestions on framing the Right to Information
>> rules was misplaced, Rajya Sabha was informed today.
>>
>> Minister of state for Personnel, Public greivances and Pensions V
>> Narayanasamy said comments of the stakeholders were invited on the
>> proposed Right to Information Rules by putting an Office Memorandum on
>> the official website of Department of Personnel and Training on
>> December 10, 2010.
>>
>> "Comments received from stakeholders on the proposed rules were
>> misplaced. The folder has since been reconstructed," he said in his
>> reply in the House. "
>>
>> In this connexion,
>>
>> I am aggrieved that no copy of FIR reporting the loss / theft has been
>> provided to me, or even the particulars of the concerned police
>> station provided to me.
>>
>> I am especially aggrieved because the Mr Rajeev Kapoor (then JS/A&TA
>> and also nodal PG Director) failed to register on CPGRAMS my Public
>> Grievance in this regard sent to him by email on 21.March.2011 with
>> subject "PUBLIC GRIEVANCE PETITION: Violation of Official Secrets Act
>> by Officers of DoPT". For ready reference I am reproducing the text of
>> my email so that PROMPT AND GENUINE ACTION IS TAKEN since I am
>> concerned that Hon'ble MoS has been misled into giving false
>> information to Parliament. Specifically I allege that the file/folder
>> was not misplaced but it was ILLEGALLY taken out of DoPT premises for
>> private photocopying to provide to foreign intelligence agencies and
>> was not returned. For reasons best known to DoPT no action was taken
>> on my confidential information and I wish to provide all the
>> information in my knowledge to the investigative agencies to whom the
>> DoPT is duty bound to report the loss / theft..
>>
>> I would be obliged if my instant PUBLIC GRIEVANCE email is
>> acknowledged within 3 days as provided for in the Public Grievance
>> redressal scheme.
>>
>> With best wishes
>>
>> Yours faithfully
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>>
>>
>> COPY of Email of 21.03.2011
>>
>> To:
>> Jt-Secretary (AT&A)/DoPT,
>> as Nodal Public Grievance Officer/DoPT
>>
>> CONFIDENTIAL / NOT TO BE DISCLOSED
>>
>> BY EMAIL
>>
>> Date: 21-March-2011
>>
>> Sir
>>
>> I am constrained to inform / petition / complain that 2 officers of
>> your Ministry have committed offences punishable under the Official
>> Secrets Act and/or Prevention of Corruption Act by corruptly
>> disclosing information submitted in confidence to your Ministry to
>> persons acting at the behest of foreigners inimical / opposed to the
>> Union of India. It is further pertinent that these brazen acts were
>> committed despite clear warnings and cautions I conveyed to them well
>> in advance. I therefore request you to kindly inquire into the
>> following facts and initiate actions for the requisite prosecution of
>> your junior officers under the applicable laws of India.
>>
>> FACTS:
>>
>> 1) That on or about 10th December 2010 the DoPT published on its
>> website an OM inviting comments on draft RTI Rules by email to
>> US-RTI/DoPT (Shri R.K.Girdhar).
>>
>> 2) That I alongwith other persons known to me duly submitted our
>> detailed comments by email to Shri Girdhar in confidence, each
>> communication being clearly marked at the outset as submitted in
>> Confidence / not to be disclosed. I was especially concerned that my
>> communications not be conveyed to the "NAC" ie. National Advisory
>> Council (which as per me is an extra-statutory body, and a nest of
>> foreign spies and corrupt former public servants eased out of
>> Government for acting as lobbyists/touts).
>>
>> 3) That on or about 29 December 2010 I came to know that a certain
>> Commodore (Retd) Lokesh Batra who is closely associated with NAC
>> member Ms Aruna Roy applied in RTI to Shri R.K Girdhar/CPIO to be
>> provided access to the comments I had submitted in confidence. I
>> promptly, ie. on the very same day, emailed Shri R.K.Girdhar informing
>> him that I was a "third party" opposing disclosure of my
>> communications which were submitted strictly in confidence to DoPT. I
>> specifically called on Shri Girdhar to issue me a statutory 3rd party
>> notice u/s 11 of RTI Act 2005 if he intended to disclose to any person
>> information which either related to me or was submitted by me in
>> confidence. I also say that I thereafter spoke to Mr Girdhar
>> telephonically and reiterated that I was opposed to any disclosure of
>> my numerous filings to DoPT to any outside person.
>>
>> 4) I was therefore shocked to learn that on 2 February 2011 Shri RK
>> Girdhar issued a letter to Commodore Batra (File No.12/325/2010-IR)
>> communicating a time and date where my filed comments would be
>> disclosed to Commodore Lokesh Batra. I am reliably given to understand
>> that the inspection took place on afternoon of 18.Feb.2011 in offices
>> of Shri K./G.Verma and that Commodore Batra was provided xerox copies
>> on the spot of all my communications without payment of the prescribed
>> fees, due to a telephone call from Ms Aruna Roy (honorary member NAC)
>> for this. I am outraged at the blatant subversion of the laws of India
>> to cause me loss and harm by members of your Department. I am outraged
>> that Shri Girdhar failed to issue me a 3rd party notice and disclosed
>> my confidential information to the NAC through Commodore Batra. I am
>> outraged that Shri K.G Verma/Directior RTI went out of his way
>> to show all my confidential papers to Commodore Batra in his office
>> and provided privately a copy set of my papers to Commodore Batra
>> (without deposit of prescribed fees into Govt Treasury) at the behest
>> of Ms Aruna Roy who is an influential private lobbyist. I am outraged
>> that the entire RTI section of your Department has willfully and
>> corruptly evaded diarising the comments received from the public on
>> the aforesaid OM of 10.Dec.2010, so as to disclose them to foreign
>> spies who misuse RTI process. I am outraged that your junior officers
>> have corruptly disclosed my information to Commodore Batra in breach
>> of penal provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act in addition to
>> penal provisions of Official Secrets Act. I am also concerned that
>> Shri K.G.Verma in particular has been influenced by Ms Aruna Roy to
>> water down provisions of draft RTI Rules from 250 word application
>> limit to 500 words whereas I had called for this limit to be further
>> tightened to 150 words etc. as per other laws.
>>
>> Accordingly, I call upon you to
>>
>> A) Kindly acknowledge this Grievance Petition immediately, and
>> b) Kindly take all requisite actions to resolve my grievances under
>> advice/reply to me.
>>
>> Yours faithfully
>>
>> Sarbajit Roy
>> B-59 Defence Colony
>> New Delhi 110024
>> Tel : 09311448069
>>
>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment