In my own case of a civil suit Advocate filed a wrong reply by Affidavit. Not only this but the details were also untrue wholly !!! It ( Reply )was not served upon to me and a wrong representation was filed , stating that Plaintiff's Advocate was not available in Court Compound!!! Copy of reply was not served upon to me!!! Against the process of Civil Procedure Code!!!!!!!! N M was dismissed in my absence!!!!!!!!!
What should I do for all wrong process.
From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent
That Lawyers cannot represent before the CIC is duly notified by Central Govt
in form of RTI Rules
The counter of the CIC (by way of Regulations) that Lawyers could
represent before CIC has been struck down by a Division Bench of Delhi
High Court in my case, and Rules are very much in force since there is
no stay on this by the Supreme Court - time period allowed for appeal
/ SLP is over and it is hence FINAL.
On 8/28/12, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can send the copy of this notification.
>>
> Bhaskar
>
>> --- On *Mon, 20/8/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not
>> allowed to represent
>> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>> Date: Monday, 20 August, 2012, 10:27 AM
>>
>> Since advocates (legal practitioners) are prohibited (by duly notified
>> Rules) from representing
>> either side at the 2nd Appeal stage, there can be no objection to
>> their being disallowed at lower proceedings.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>
What should I do for all wrong process.
C A Shah D J
USA
From: M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in>
To: "humjanenge@googlegroups.com" <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent
Ol. inform the name of the authority before whom the false affidavit has been submitted., it is court, CIC or SIC.
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent
To: humjanenge <humjanenge@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not allowed to represent
That Lawyers cannot represent before the CIC is duly notified by Central Govt
in form of RTI Rules
The counter of the CIC (by way of Regulations) that Lawyers could
represent before CIC has been struck down by a Division Bench of Delhi
High Court in my case, and Rules are very much in force since there is
no stay on this by the Supreme Court - time period allowed for appeal
/ SLP is over and it is hence FINAL.
On 8/28/12, Bhaskar Prabhu <mahitiadhikarmanch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can send the copy of this notification.
>>
> Bhaskar
>
>> --- On *Mon, 20/8/12, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] RTI Act -Se. 19 First Appeal: Advocate not
>> allowed to represent
>> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com
>> Date: Monday, 20 August, 2012, 10:27 AM
>>
>> Since advocates (legal practitioners) are prohibited (by duly notified
>> Rules) from representing
>> either side at the 2nd Appeal stage, there can be no objection to
>> their being disallowed at lower proceedings.
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment