Wednesday, May 28, 2014

RE: [IAC#RG] [hc] Re: Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

29/5/14
Dear Sirs, Since enough has been said for and against the personal bond requirement in defamation case and
 
Now that Mr. Kejriwal is out, let us close this discussion irrespective of the merits/demerits of the case. In any case he has also approached the HC and let us wait for the verdict.
Regds
JKGaur
 
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:55:52 +0530
From: raviforjustice@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] [hc] Re: Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

Wow, Adv Sureshan, that is a new twist to the tale! Where does contempt of court come from? I do not know if the magistrate has discretion in seeking bond for bail or can waive it, but I believed it was just procedure and the option was with AK to avail bail by providing bond or go to jail. There is no question of personal principles and contempt of court in this case!

regards n bw

ravi


On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Sureshan <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
Many stories appeared in re Arvind incarnation is wrong. He was sent to JC for not submitting surety bond
In fact this action from A K shouldn't make himself liable for JC. what is ignored by experts are the power of the magistrate. This is a case of mere discarding the authority of the court.A K s principle does not allow him to submit bond.he keeps his principles above the authority of the court. SO THIS IS A CLEAR CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE
Magistrate does not have authority to take action as she had to refer the case to HC as per the contempt of court act .hence present JC OF AK IS VOILATIVE of ARTICLE 21 of the constitution.

Ravindran P M <raviforjustice@gmail.com> wrote:

It doesn't even require a defamation case to arrest a citizen and tie him up in court procedures. 
If I have a friend in police I can get even NaMo arrested thus (of course now his SPG would not allow that!) 
or atleast get a summons sent to him by a court! One journalist proved it by having a sting operation in a Gujarat court.
He got non-bailable warrants issued against the then Prez Dr Kalam and the CJI! 
Under those circumstance ordinary citizens can only suffer the atrocious court procedures!

regards  n bw

ravi


On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Madhav Nalapat <mdnalapat@gmail.com> wrote:
Under the colonial law continued by Nehru in India a citizen can be jailed very easily. The powers given to a magistrate are huge and were codified under the British. It is appalling that Kejriwal can be summoned by a court and jailed just for saying a politician was corrupt. To make a citizen run from court to court is so easy in India

From: vasant sardesai
Sent: Saturday, 24 May 2014 19:26
Reply To: vasant sardesai
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] [hc] Re: Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

I think there is some misunderstanding; he was not jailed simply for calling a prosperous politician corrupt. The defamation case filed by Gadkari is yet to be heard and decided. He was jailed for not attending the court in spite of agreeing to be present.
 
V.S.Sardesai 

From: "Satya D hitaya123@gmail.com [hinducivilization]" <hinducivilization@yahoogroups.com>
To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; "stop-corruption-worldwide@googlegroups.com" <stop-corruption-worldwide@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Friday, 23 May 2014 8:34 PM
Subject: [hc] Re: [IAC#RG] Fwd: Arvind Kejriwal in jail!

 
I agree with Nalapat ji.  This is not about Arvind Kejriwal, this is about Indian democracy.   There is no reason to jail him for what he said.   In defamation against public persons, they can always call a press conference and refute it publicly.  That is the US law and I understand the same with Indian law.


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Madhav Nalapat <mdnalapat@gmail.com> wrote:
It is unfortunate that the (colonial-era) laws are such that an
individual can get sent to jail simply for calling a prosperous
politician corrupt. Whatever one's views on Arvind Kejriwal,his
incarceration will have a chilling effect on freedom of expression.The
Indian media,as is its won't,has chased the "lizard's tail" of Arvind
refusing to post a bail bond,while missing out on the "lizard" viz a
magistrate jailing an individual for what in more robust democracies
passes off as fair comment about political leaders

Madhav


On 5/22/14, Shaila S <shaila62@gmail.com> wrote:
> arvind kejriwal is a fraud

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/



--

Regards,
Satya
#evmindia,  #satyad
.

__,_._,___







Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Veteran Major P M Ravindran
 
You may also like to visit:
'Judiciary Watch' at www.vigilonline.com 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)