Re: [IAC#RG] Appeal to Shanti Bhushan ji

Dear Sureshan,

All your questions are irrelevant.

1) You concede surely that Sanjeev Sabhlok left the IAS under cloudy
circumstances and then emigrated to Australia and works for the Govt
there. Almost like Philby and Maclean.

2) From Australia Mr. Sabhlok launched a campaign of vicious cyber
abuse on many eminent Indians, so long as UPA Govt was in power and
was protecting him. Now he is having to delete all his abuses because
the legal machinery is working against him. He did all this of course
as a paid foreign agent working for a foreign govt inimical to India's
economic interests.

3) In 2012 Sabhlok allegedly came to India at the direction of his
foreign masters to wage war against the Indian State and spread
disaffection against the people. The charges against him were
extremely serious ones under IPC. Is it a false statement to say that
Sabhlok is an accused in FIR No. 183/2012 in PS:Parliament St. charged
u/s 186, 353, 147, 148, 149, 34 IPC, ie. rioting, conspiracy and
criminally assaulting police officer with deadly weapon(s) ?

4) It is therefore quite strange that you have allowed this foreign
agent provocateur to draft your party's Constitution and insert an
absurd clause for foreigners to become Honorary Members and stand for
party elections and be elected to National Executive etc. and thus be
able to self describe themselves as "senior leaders". Such tomfoolery
betrays that your party is not at all serious. In fact I find the
Constitution of Swarna Bharat Party to be as poorly written as
Sabhlok's rotten book (even Kejriwal's execrable book 'Swaraj' makes
for better reading and contains more sense).

5) May I ask if Sanjeev Sabhlok has paid his party membership fee, or
was the fee waived for "life" only to induct a bunch of foreigners as
"Honorary" life-time members who would run Swarna Bharat Party as an
NRI party by remote control from Australia, London and Nigeria,
without being subject to Indian Tax questions, or to emulate Sabhlok's
ex-IAS colleagues who took no money from NAC but were well paid for
passing on the secrets which passed through their hands ? I dare say
that Sonia, Rahul, Priyanka and Roberto will also be "senior leaders"
of SBP once they are exiled from India.

6) No matter what you say, at IAC we are now genetically and
memetically programmed to distrust foreigners and their "lackeys".

7) There is no disconnect in IAC over Sabhlok or Kejriwal. We believe
that all foreigners or foreign financed Indians should have no say /
role in Indian politics. we encourage all our friends in active politics
to remove such person from their parties

Sarbajit

On 9/29/14, SURESHAN P <sureshandelhi@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have specif and clear answer to every issue,
>
> Before that some simple question Sarbajeet
> 1) As per your understanding how much amount is required to start a
> political party.
> 2) Are you aware about the source of income spent for the SBP registration
> If not , it will be available in FTI forum along with fund raising appeals
> and donors details go through it and after tell me from which foreign
> source we got money.?
> Now December 2012, it was not Sanjeev many Delhities who wants to see rule
> of law prevailed in country, sat on Dharna and no body instigated any riot
> as no riot as alleged happened , even that Police constable died on heart
> attack and not due to any riot, So don't make incorrect and false
> statements.
> You have disconnected with Sanejeev on the issue of Kejriwal allegation ,
> till then you did not find any foreign issue,
> There are many patriots residing in foreign countries, they left India due
> to many reasons, not because they are against this country.
> While living in foreign countries their soul always work for their mother
> land.
>
> Not like other parties we don't have any high command or superior leaders,
> True sanjeev is one of the senior leader of our party and his position is
> based upon the party constitution which is very well approved by the
> "Election Commission of India'
> This party is not owned by any individual.
>
>
> If time permits I will try to add few other thinks tomorrow.
>
> regards