RE: [IAC#RG] IMPOSITION OF HINDI ON NON HINDI SPEAKING STATES

Thursday, September 18, 2014

RE: [IAC#RG] IMPOSITION OF HINDI ON NON HINDI SPEAKING STATES

I fully agree with Govind Vishwakarma's opinion about Hindi.

Thanks with Best Regards

CA Chitranjan Bharadia

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of Pramod Yadava
Sent: 17 September 2014 23:01
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPOSITION OF HINDI ON NON HINDI SPEAKING STATES

Dear Mr Vishwakarma:

We need to be more objective. Someone born with a different natural language than Hindi is not at fault and his or her natural language should be given the same respect as any other language of the nation. We cannot call them sick minds if they do not accept another language as national language while status of their own languageremains undefined. It is another atter that the Nation needs a common language for communication. This can only come by consnsus and not by thrusting one language as the national language an dozens of others as class II languages. Please understand this and do not provoke a north south sentiment.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Hari Govind Vishwakarma <hgvkarma@gmail.com> wrote:

Once, in 2007,I was getting reservation ticket at CST railway station of Mumbai. A Tamil-speaking person was in queue before me. He filled his reservation form in Tamil as he was unable to speak English or Hindi. But the ticket booking clerk was unable to speak or read the Tamil writing, so he could not understand where that passenger wants to go. A serious problem was generated there and time was passing as no one know Tamil language. After 20 minutes, one Tamil railway officer from reservation department came and filled the form in English and Tamil passenger got reservation ticket.

It means the people opposing Hindi don't have option of Hindi, as it is impossible to teach English to each and every citizen of Tamilnadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) English. But other hand, it is possible for them that they could average Hindi.

Since India a democratic nation. Every citizen has right to move every corner of country. For this citizen has option to speak English or Hindi. If you are going for pilgrimage like Amarnath or Vaishnodevi or Ajmer then you have to speak English or Hindi to convey your need to other. But after so many effort not more than 10 percent population learn English but without effort around 95 percent people understand Hindi and 90 percent speak. So, what is wrong to speak Hindi as in even very remote areas of the country an illiterate person can speak Hindi.

Mr. N.S.Venkataraman just come out from your sick mind set and try to understand the real problem. Yes if you want to live in your own state then keep continue opposing Hindi. But you can not prevent people of speaking Hindi.

Hari Govind Vishwakarma

On 16 September 2014 10:58, Navnith Krishnan <navkris@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dear Shri Roy,

India is a multilingual society.If any of the langauages is imposed as an official language,others fear that tey will not get a level playing ground.More over some of the southern languages are older than Hindi.This type of fear can only be alleviated by time.If any imposition is made,it will attract violent protests.The Hindi speaking states have thrown into the dust bin the three language formula and are refusing to acknowledge any of the southern languages.The agitation by a section of the IAS 'aspirants' against class X level english comprehension test shows their intolerabce.Language is a dividing factor and time should be given to settle it.After all more people speak Hindi now a days in the south.Why are we not stressing on the unifying factor in our country,Hinduism.A Kasmiri Pandit is physically and linguistically different from a southern Tamilian.So also is a Manipuri or Assamese from a Rajasthani or Gujrathi.But all of them have a common religeous heritage.Why not stress on that.If English is not allowed why should we allow Islam and Christianity both alien religeons. The problem is that we are still carrying Nehru's 'secular ghost'.

navnith

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:42:45 +0530
From: sroy.mb@gmail.com
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] IMPOSITION OF HINDI ON NON HINDI SPEAKING STATES

Dear Mr Venkatraman
   
  This is an emotive and divisive issue which has been discussed several
  times before here. Nothing will be served by going over the same
  ground. in any case Mr. Modi is not Mr Shastri.
   
  Yes, Mr. Modi belongs to the Hindi knowing group (he knows some /
  enough English). Get used to the new reality - "jaise Raja vaise
  Praja' (what the King is so must be the people). If you want English
  back, you know who to vote for next as PM (even if he is a sex-addict
  junkie / flunky).
   
  Sarbajit
   
  On 9/15/14, Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
  > To
  >
  > India Against Corruption
  >
  > IMPOSITION  OF  HINDI  ON  NON  HINDI  SPEAKING  STATES
  >
  > It is surprising that those in charge of policy making in NDA  government
  > do not understand the intensity of the anger and frustration  amongst the
  > people in the non Hindi states due to the subtle attempts of Modi
  > government to gradually impose Hindi.
  >
  > The genuine fear of the people in the non Hindi speaking states is that
  > they would be reduced to second class citizens in the country  if Hindi
  > would be imposed , as those speaking Hindi will get distinct advantage over
  > the non Hindi speaking people at the national level.
  >
  > Mr. Naredndra Modi does not seem to be aware of the  intense and popular
  > anti Hindi agitation in non Hindi speaking states particularly in Tamil
  > Nadu, when Mr. Lal Bahadur Shastri was the Prime Minister.  Schools and
  > colleges had to remain closed for around three months in Tamil Nadu due to
  > anti Hindi  protest by the students. Finally, Mr. Shastri had to give an
  > assurance that Hindi would not be made national language so long as non
  > Hindi speaking people would not want it. The situation has not much changed
  > as far as the imposition of Hindi is concerned.
  >
  > Today, India has enough problems and there is no feelings of difference in
  > the country on  language issue. Mr. Narendra Modi  should not create new
  > issues by trying to impose Hindi.
  >
  > Even today, many people in non Hindi speaking states , particularly in
  > Tamil Nadu , feel like aliens as they do not understand Mr. Modi speaking
  > Hindi everywhere without any translators. When he spoke in Hindi to the
  > school children on Teacher's Day , lakhs of school students in non Hindi
  > speaking states felt left out and wondered  as to whether the Prime
  > Minister belong to  Hindi knowing people only.
  >
  > N.S.Venkataraman
  >
  > Nandini Voice For The Deprived