Re: [IAC#RG] DOES VERDICT AGAINST JAYALALITHA SIGNIFY ANYTHING ?

Dear Navnith

It was the Income Tax (not the CBI) who were prosecuting this case
which Sureshan has cited.

You would be pleased to know that IAC, through our co-Convenor Mr.
Karira, is pursuing how UPA Govt manipulated taking CBI out of RTI so
that pending RTIs for investigations into assets of Mulayam Singh and
Mayawati were hushed up and they supported Congress in crucial FDI
vote.

Pleadings are complete in High Court but CBI was continually delaying
and seeking adjournments.

Sarbajit

On 9/30/14, Navnith Krishnan <navkris@hotmail.com> wrote:
> When are we going to understand that our Courts are not Courts of Justice
> but Courts of Evidence. If the prosecution as per the directions of the
> political master dilutes prosecution, any culprit can escape. Perhaps this
> might have happened in the case of Mayavati who was helped by Congress.
> Prosecution, in this case CBI, has not countered her defence that all the
> assets acquired her are gifted by general public , gift includes landed
> property and money
>
> navnith
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:07:26 +0530
> From: sureshandelhi@gmail.com
> To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] DOES VERDICT AGAINST JAYALALITHA SIGNIFY ANYTHING ?
>
> http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1613352/
>
> see the above link , this is the judgment on an identical disproportionate
> assets issue concerning about Smt Mayavati , The Judgment is written by well
> Known Judge Justice Suresh Kait,,,
> Here the court dismissed the allegations against mayavati saying that all
> the assets acquired By Mayavati are gifted by general public , gift includes
> landed property and money. Many of them gifted their nearly half of their
> assets still court believes it as true and correct ...
>
> regards
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jaya Vindhyala <jaya12265@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Dear sir,certainly we welcome the judgement, but, at the same time we should
> observe circumstances and judiciary accountability, because judiciary losing
> independent attitude, politicians interference is strong, judiciary
> judgments also reflections on ground level parties are working as a
> backbone. so on this ground we may observe and study the same. otherwise we
> may run in the flow emotions..jaya vindhyala
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, MRCI - Ramesh Patil <mrciin@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> MRCI - Ramesh Patil (mrciin@yahoo.co.in) is not on your Guest List
>
>
> | Approve sender
> | Approve domain
>
>
>
>
>
> I agree Joy-Lalitha 's case is like one sollow does not make summer.Entire
> system needs to be cleaned.No where Modi talks about Corruption-he is
> obsessed with cleanliness and sanitation-He knows it would be sheer waste of
> time and energy in even addressing the Corruption-When ex Cm Yedurappa was
> put behind bars for 9 months -was elevated to VP -In other words if you can
> not resist Enjoy
> RAMESH PATIL
>
>
> MRCI
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:42 AM, Venkatraman Ns
> <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> To India Against Corruption
>
> DOES VERDICT AGAINST JAYALALITHA SIGNIFY ANYTHING ? The court verdict
> punishing Ms. Jayalalitha in the corruption case certainly is a step
> forward in the anti corruption movement in India. However, this verdict does
> not by itself should give any big hope , as the verdict has come after
> nearly eighteen years of trial. Thousands of corrupt persons in various
> walks of life including politicians,
> bureaucrats, educationists and even so called religious leaders are now
> going scot free, as the process of judiciary takes very long time and many
> of them do not receive the much deserved punishment in their life time.
> Further, the suspicions about judiciary itself is a big deterrent for the
> anti corruption movement in India. In the present circumstances, one
> cannot expect much from the politicians in power and judiciary to improve
> the judicial system and ensure speedy justice. Huge pressure has to be
> applied not only on the government but also on judiciary to ensure delivery
> of speedy justice , so that fear of punishment would deter the persons from
> indulging in corruption and nepotism. With the media also increasingly going
> under the control of business houses, the anti corruption movement in India
> has to increasingly depend upon social media to spread the voice of wisdom.
> In such conditions , the movement like India Against Corruption has huge
> responsibility and it should play a very strong proactive role. Increasing
> participation of concerned persons in expressing their protests and voice
> through such movement is also vitally important to build a climate of anti
> corruption in India.
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
> --
> http://freedomteam.in/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/ftilogo-new-300x183.jpg
> P. Sureshan,
> Advocate-on-record, Supreme Court Of India,
> NLC( India ) Law Office
> No. 90, Second Floor , Bank Enclave , Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-92..... Ph:
> 9818083219,8802797432,01132081075
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in