Tell that to the poor under privileged, uneducated, daily wage earner whose only recreation is pro creation. We used to have NIRODH advertisements prominently as 25 paise per three. What has happened?
Even at the worst of HIV fear, nirodh was not popularized. Today better family planning means less population and less population means less number of MPs and MLAs. Less MPs and MLAs means less political clout. Which politician would need it? Failed family planning means more votes. Your dream is partially fulfilled by the IT people who have less or no children due to many reasons. Regards.
ravindra malhotra <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
>After 1977, no law maker has been able to gather courage even to mention about family planning in any forum - probably not even in private. Production level being much higher in lower income groups, the number of people below poverty line keeps on increasing, government being forced to control the figure by manupulating the threshold level of Poverty..
>
>R.N.Malhotra
>
>--------------------------------------------
>On Fri, 6/5/15, R N Goil <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
> To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> Date: Friday, June 5, 2015, 11:36 AM
>
> Let us
> have the courage to follow 1 child norm like China for 20
> years to solve most of our ills. RN
> Goil
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, 5 June 2015 1:54 AM, Gaur J K
> <gaurjk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> #yiv3486396644 #yiv3486396644 --
> .yiv3486396644hmmessage P
> {
> margin:0px;padding:0px;}
> #yiv3486396644 body.yiv3486396644hmmessage
> {
> font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;}
> #yiv3486396644
> 03/06/15
> A PIL was filed in the Suprme Court
> in 2008 seeking speedy justice by some NGOs. After a period
> of 6 years the Court has summarily disposed of the
> petition in December 2014.
> To clear the
> mounting backlog of cases in different courts and to ensure
> that the backlog does not reappear a number of submissions
> were made for increasing the strength of the judges, filling
> up of the existing vacancies in subordinate courts, create
> addl. infrastructure facilities including greater
> transparency and accountability. The court observed that the
> judiciary has alrrady considered most of the issues raised
> in the petition indepndently and finally. Janhit Manch( Mr.
> Rayani) is one of the petitioners.So where is the
> hope for improvement in the justice delivery
> system?JKGaur
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015
> 10:15:55 +0530
> From: deegees11@gmail.com
> To: trident142@yahoo.co.in
> CC:
> truevalue_pandian@yahoo.com; iyer_ga@yahoo.com;
> rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in; vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com;
> j_nc2000@yahoo.com; indiaresists@lists.riseup.net;
> Janshakti@yahoogroups.com; barkha@ndtv.com
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN
> JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
>
> IAC was started by Kejriwal and
> now it has been hijacked by BJP morons.
> On 1 June 2015 at 09:47,
> capt beniwal <trident142@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
> its We the People
> who have to oversee the judges through live telecast of
> court proceedings.
> presently applicable colonial rules IPC/CrPC
> the judges have too much discretion, as was designed for
> Britishers. must be harshly limited.
> since the judges are also
> servants of We the People.
> if we see how law is made then we must also
> see how that law is applied. therefore I have been
> requesting President and CJI to start live telecast of
> SC proceedings. only dishonest judges will object.
>
> rgds.
> beniwal
>
>
> On Sunday, 31 May
> 2015 9:12 PM, PANDIAN Paulraj <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> It is NOT our intention to
> blame any one or any individual or the system. WE ARE
> CONFUSED. One judge says GUILTY. The same case, same
> accused, same arguments, another more experienced, more
> knowledgeable judge is saying NOT GUILTY. Who is wrong and
> who is right? It can not be brushed aside as awn aberration.
> Both are presenting 800 plus pages of reasoning to
> substantiate their conclusions. Obviously one of them is
> wrong. I am personally scared when my case comes up for
> judgment who will try me and with what result? Added to it
> is the immunity granted to the judiciary by itself. But then
> who will oversee the judiciary? The Politicians? That is the
> joke of the millennium. Regards.
>
> Gopalkrishnan iyer <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> Simply
> put, naxalism, terrorism etc. are the offshoots of loosing
> faith in judiciary! One can find well educated people(if
> education is important) resorting to extremism/rebellion!
> Discrimination, deprivation, disparity are all leading to
> extremism!! Governance should incorporate all attributes
> that give rise to the above to be evened out!
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 31 May
> 2015 7:50 AM, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear
> Sir,Till date our Constitution has not define the
> word Citizen of India.Citizenship Act,1955 has
> not yet been accepted by Government of India and the State
> Governments.The judges are not law
> makers.How many people of this country has signed
> the documents called Citizen of India format designed by the
> bureaucracy.It was proposed in the year
> 2004.Therefore please do not blame the
> judiciary.
>
> Warm regards,
> Rakshpal
> Abrol
> Consumer Activist
> 9820203154
> rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in
>
>
> From: PANDIAN
> Paulraj <truevalue_pandian@Yahoo.com>
>
> To: vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com
>
> Cc: Gopalkrishnan iyer
> <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>;
> Dr. NC Jain <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>;
> indiaresists@lists.riseup.net;
> Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>;
> Janshakti <Janshakti@yahoogroups.com>;
> Barkha Dutt <barkha@ndtv.com>
>
> Sent: Saturday, 30 May
> 2015 10:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG]
> WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
> ALARMING
>
> Remember. In India LAW simply means
> Leave Accused if Wealthy.
> It does not stop with actors, politicians
> bureaucrats and the like. It is not the mistake
> of the judges. Advocates should not take up cases they know
> to be unjust or illegal. Finding a way to somehow save their
> client is not fair. They no doubt save the client; but in
> that process ruin the moral fibre of the nation. The only
> way a common man can show his displeasure is by social
> boycott. If you do not agree with the let away culprit,
> don't see his movies for ever; or don't buy the
> product the cricketer endorses ; or don't vote for the
> party the politicians belong to. Ganga may not be cleaner by
> then. The country will become cleaner.
>
> Vijay Kapoor <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In this context,
> the recent order by SC as reported in the media, that a
> "judge" who has passed an absurd order cannot be
> questioned, is even more absurd. Question then arises: that
> if the "judge" even in an absurd order cannot be
> questioned, can a judge who passes a criminal order, say,
> "go and shoot Mr. X" or "go and commit
> rape" or "burn down the house" can also not
> be brought to book !? Then can an absurd "judge"
> who passes an order, say, "I hereby sack the President
> of India" or "The parliament stands
> dissolved" be not brought to book ?
> >The judges need to ponder the deleterious
> effects on the nation of their virtually complete
> accountability.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >--------------------------------------------
> >On Wed, 5/20/15, Rakshpal Abrol <rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in>
> wrote:
> >
> > Subject:
> Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY ,
> CONSEQUENCES CAN BE ALARMING
> > To:
> "Gopalkrishnan iyer" <iyer_ga@yahoo.com>,
> "Dr. NC Jain" <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>,
> "vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com"
> <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com>,
> "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015, 1:04 AM
> >
> > The system was
> > evolved taking into consideration of
> British
> > laws.Most of the Advocates
> follow
> > the same and being influenced
> the judges pass the
> > order.The
> > Justice is never delivered it is
> purchased.
> > Warm regards,
> > Rakshpal Abrol
> >
> Consumer Activist
> > 9820203154
> > rakshpal.abrol@yahoo.co.in
> >
> >
> > From: Gopalkrishnan
> >
> iyer <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> >
> > To: Dr. NC Jain
> > <j_nc2000@yahoo.com>;
> > "vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com"
> > <vijay99kapoor@yahoo.com>;
> > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, 19 May
> > 2015 3:22 PM
> >
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG]
> > WHEN PEOPLE LOSE
> FAITH IN JUDICIARY , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
> > ALARMING
> >
> > There is
> > no doubt
> left as to the fact that Indian justice system is
> > not free from influence from powers that
> be, money power and
> > high profile
> advocates.The recent verdicts one after the
> > other seeng Salman khan virtually a free
> man within hours
> > despite being
> convicted is ample proof that justice delivery
> > is maneovreable! Harish Salve's
> presense in the court in
> > a way subdued
> the Justice!! Or else all those involved in
> > deliberating whether Salman is a culprit
> or not are not at
> > all knowing the law
> on which they argued for 13 years!
> >
> Jayalalitha'scase too is anopther instance cite! Can
> a
> > common man avail the services of
> Salve or the like of him
> > and if so at
> what cost and how fast! Common man has to wait
> > for months for an appontment where as all
> appointments were
> > cancelled and flew
> down in Salmans case!!I should
> > say the
> justice system also is influenced by status of
> > people involved!
> >
> > Insider
> > trader Gupta
> in the US was convicted in a matter of days and
> > sentence followed in the same pace whereas
> Harshad
> > Mehta's case is far from
> being over though the accused
> > passed
> away long back!
> > I think the jury
> system
> > could speed up the justice
> system with least chance of a
> > faulty
> delivery of justice
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday, 18 May
> 2015 12:47 PM, Dr.
> > NC Jain <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear
> > sir
> > Such instances are very common.As everone
> is aware, justice
> > delayed is justice
> denied and In India, it is a common
> >
> practice in almost,most department. I have a case of
> > noncompliance of CIC order for the last 4
> years and cic is
> > not replying/taking
> any action on it. In short,India is free
> > but not Indians.We have to struggle to
> make Indians free.
> > Dr
> > N C Jain
> >
> >
> > On Friday,
> May 15, 2015 1:14 AM,
> > Vijay Kapoor
> <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > In
> > theory there
> appeals are possible to set right the wrongs of
> > lower courts. But things are entirely
> different in
> > practice.
> > I cite a couple of my own
> > experiences:
> >
> > 1. I filed a
> >
> consumer complaint against a leading industrialist and
> > builder of Goa in the State Consumer
> court. The
> > "president judge",
> one Mr. Nelson Britto,
> > apparently held
> the case in my favour because he granted me
> > penal damages of Rs. 3.0 lacs against the
> builder. But look
> > at the sheer
> malafides of the "judge" and his
> > "order", who apparently imposed
> the penalty as a
> > smokescreen to shield
> AND REWARD the errant industrialist.
> >
> His entire order does not mention a single word as to why
> he
> > imposed the penalty, and whether the
> builder was in
> > deficency, in unfair
> trade practices, and providing
> >
> hazardous services, WHEN the industrialist-builder has
> lied
> > under oath and put a false
> document said to be the NOC from
> > navy
> in the agreement to sell; the builder admitted in
> > cross-examination under oath in that he
> destroyed evidence;
> > that he never
> obtained the mandatory NOC from navy; that the
> > brochure placed on record by me was his
> brochure; that he
> > contravened
> > Registration Act; that he
> > contravened The Transfer of Property Act
> by not disclosing
> > material defects in
> the property; etc. and so on. There is a
> > contravention of at least half a dozen
> major Acts and laws
> > of the land. But
> the "judge" does not discuss any
> > of the law points involved and does not
> utter a single word
> > about all those.
> Finally to cap it all the "judge"
> > ignores the prayers made by me to either
> give market value
> > (with written
> quotations from 5 vicinity builders) OR a
> > similar flat in nearby locality. Instead
> he gives interest @
> > 15%, which means a
> loss in capital value to me of over 10
> >
> lacs (excluding interest cost), and a corresponding gain
> to
> > the industrialist.
> >
> > 2. In
> > another case in the same court the
> "judge", one
> > Mr.
> Prabhudessai, who claims to be a law teacher in a local
> > college, ignores all evidence on record
> and several points
> > of law raised: Can
> the opposite party submissions that are
> >
> not on affidavit and are merely verbal, be entertained by
> > the court; Can a piece of paper without an
> Invoice Number /
> > Tax registration,
> taxes be a valid "Invoice /
> >
> Bill"; can the OP who has approached the court in
> not
> > good faith be entertained; when
> there are 6 different
> > agreements
> between the parties and with different dates and
> > terms & conditions, can the matter be
> properly decided
> > without first deciding
> which of the agreements is the valid
> >
> one; when the OP himself does not dispute or refute the
> > evidence placed on record, can the
> "judge"
> > unilaterally decide
> differently that too without any
> >
> reasoning; can the "judge" overrule at least 10
> SC
> > judgments on different subjects; can
> the "judge"
> > overrule the law
> and the intent to
> > the
> > parliment; can the "judge" order
> costs when
> > several issues of law have
> been raised; etc. The appeal
> > before the
> National Commission was the same .......
> > non-appreciation of evidence on record and
> several law
> > points raised. At this
> point as I came down with health
> >
> problems I could not pursue the matter in the SC.
> >
> > There are many fine
> judges (I
> > recall Justices Mr. Sachar
> and Mrs. Leila Seth, who settled
> > my PF
> case in just 4 hearings and did not allow the govt.
> > lawyers to dilly-dally. I also recall the
> justice in Delhi
> > HC, who put his foot
> down by telling the govt judges to get
> >
> on with their defence, if any, and the outcome was
> quaterly
> > disclosure of results by
> corporates, and also certain
> > provisins
> for transparency in results.) But, the problem is
> > all-persuasive, and is not limited to the
> judiciary only. As
> > the SC itself has
> said that the judges are part of the same
> > society. One hopes that one encounters the
> good judges,
> > babus, netas, of which
> there are many.
> >
> >
> There is need for ALL-ROUND reform as in
> > REFORM. The elections, administration,
> judiciary, police,
> > education, health,
> ... just everything.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------
> > On Thu, 5/14/15, P.Mohana Chandran <p.mohanachandran50@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re:
> >
> [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN JUDICIARY ,
> CONSEQUENCES
> > CAN BE ALARMING
> > To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2015, 1:08 AM
> >
> > Shri
> Venkataraman may
> > kindly note that to
> err is human.Judges also
> > may err-of
> > course not with the intention to
> > err.The error may be on a
> > question of law
> > or
> on a guestion of fact.To take care of
> >
>
> > such situations,law enables affected
> party to file
> > Appeal,Review,Revision
> etc.Do you wantthe
> > Appellate Court
> to
> > confirm the trial court
> > judgement in all cases and thereby
> > make the
> > people to
> have faith in judiciary.TrialCourt and
> > Appellate Courts shall patiently hear
> the
> > matter and give
> > judgements with out fear or
> > favour.They need not worry about
> > the
> > comments that
> may be made by persons like
> >
> > Shri.Venkataraman.
> >
> If the decision of
> > Mr.Justice
> Kumaraswamy of
> > the Hon'ble
> > Karnataka High Court is based on
> erroneous
> >
> >
> calculation (mathematical error ) in calculating the
> > total
> > assets and
> total income and if the
> > mismatch is
> really more
> > than 10% as is
> > being propogated by some opposition
> leaders
> >
> > in
> Tamilnadu, a mere Application for Review will be
> > sufficient for the Judge to correct
> the
> > error.
> > The
> allegation was that since
> >
> Ms.Jayalalitha is a politician,the case was
> > prolonged for
> > more
> than a decade.On her
> > coviction,when the
> Bail matter
> > came up
> > before the Supreme Court ,coditional Bail
> was
> > granted,a consequence of which is
> expeditious
> > disposal of
> > the Appeal which resulted in
> > quick disposal of the
> > Appeal.The economic
> >
> status of the party concerned has
> >
> nothing
> > to do with the case.
> > A resourceful /wealthy
> > party may be able
> >
> to engage a team of legal
> > experts and
> may be able to come
> > out
> > successful by taking advantage of the
> loopholes in law.A
> > 'daridra
> narayana' may have to depend
> > on a
> lawyer
> > provided by Court or
> Legal
> > Services Authority who may
> or
> > may not be
> >
> good/capable of handling the matter.It is only in
> > this matter ,economically deprived
> persons are
> > in a dis
> > advantageous position.Bail is the
> > Rule and Jail is an
> >
> exception. Poor people
> > are not capable
> of engaging a lawyer
> > and in
> > cases that are not very serious,amicus
> curie is not
> > appointed by court for
> accused and hence they
> > remain in
> jail
> > for days, months and at
> > times years.
> > I
> shall cite a case
> > (Mrs.Indirra
> Gandhi)
> > where a High Court
> > 's verdict was set aside by the
> > Supreme
> > Court,not
> because the High Court was wrong but
> >
> because the Parliament amended the law with
> > retrospective
> >
> effect.Incurring expenses by
> > a
> candidate above the cut off
> > limit was
> an
> > electoral malpractice even if the
> amount is
> >
> > spent
> by a political party. Mrs.Gandhi was unseated as
> > Congress spent in excess of the cut
> off
> > amount.During
> > emergency, law was amended
> > with retrospective effect
> > stipulating that
> >
> money spent by political parties shall not
> >
> > be counted to
> calculate the cut off amount .Both the
> > decisions were correct.Perhaps Shri
> > Venkataraman might not have uttered a
> word
> > had
> >
> Ms.Jayalalitha got the Prevention of
> >
> Corruption Act
> > amended with
> retrospective
> > effect exempting
> MPs,MLAs,MLCs
> > and Central
> > and State Ministers from the per view
> of the
> > Prevention of Corruption
> Act.I appreciate Ms
> > Jayalalitha
> > for fighting the case by filing
> > Appeal engaging ,of course
> > the best legal
> >
> brain instead of managing to amend the
> >
> > Prevention of
> Corruption Act with the help of Mr Modi
> > and
> > also the
> DMK P.Mohana
> >
> >
> Chandran
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015
> > at 9:08 AM, Raghavan R N <raghavan6@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > If some one is Punished by a Court, it
> does not
> > mean Judiciary is right .
> There are many
> > cases pending
> > Judgement in a number of
> > Courts in india, the two recently
> > came up
> > for public
> attention is that of Ms Jayalalitha and
> > Mr Salman Khan
> >
> Every one
> > knows that Ms
> Jayalalitha's case
> > is
> > one related to Politics and it is natural,
> every one
> > wanted her to be punished[
> her opponents].
> > She has been an
> > actress for a long time and
> > her back ground is too good to
> > be
> > considered that
> she amassed wealth only by political
> >
> means. Judgement by a Lower Court need not
> > necessarily
> > decide
> the final outcome. Law
> > provides more
> options till
> > Supreme Court.
> > If it is a fit case for fighting, Govt
> should
> > initiate action to file a suit
> in Supreme
> > Court. None
> > prevented and no one should
> > close this option. Counting
> > dresses ,
> > chappals
> and other house hold articles for
> >
> > estimating the assets of Ms Jayalalitha
> looks
> > odd.
> > In
> the case of Ms Salman
> > Khan, it can
> be
> > appreciated that this case
> > is not of national importance.
> > Daily such
> > run over
> cases happen in India and abroad and
> >
> even yesterday three women were killed under
> > the wheels of a
> >
> police vehicle. It is an
> > accident can
> be due to
> > negligence.Here too,
> > the accused has options to
> > appeal in higher
> >
> court to get justice. Bail was granted as
> >
> > he is an actor and
> is working in number of FILMS. All get
> > affected. Granting bail , fast or slow
> cannot
> > be questioned.
> > Definitely, prominent people
> > get things done fast and for
> > others, it
> > takes
> time. It is Indian culture and way of doing
> > things in India.
> >
> > raghavan rn
> >
> >
> >
> > From: boompellivenkatrao@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:47:50 -0400
> > To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> > Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] WHEN PEOPLE LOSE
> FAITH
> > IN JUDICIARY ,
> > CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
> >
> ALARMING
> >
> > One
> more case of
> > SATYAM Ramblings Raju.
> The fraud is
> > a
> >
> open book to every one. He got bail with in a
> > month.
> > B.
> VENKAT RAO
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > On
> > 12-May-2015, at
> 3:41 am, Jagjit Ahuja <jagjit.ahuja@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Judiciary in India
> has
> > made a mockery of
> > themselves . They know that there is
> no
> >
> > one in the
> governing system who can punish them for all
> > the
> > wrongs. Now
> with the judgement made in
> > favour of
> > Jayalalitha clearly shows that
> > how our judiciary has been
> > working . The
> >
> presenting officers and the defence
> >
> > advocates have been playing games with
> each other .At
> > least punish out off
> those who have been
> > proved to be
> > wrong .
> > Same
> > thing happened with the case of Salman
> >
> > Khan.
> > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:41 PM,
> > Venkatraman Ns <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > To
> >
> > India Against
> Corruption
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > WHEN PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN
> JUDICIARY
> > , CONSEQUENCES CAN BE
> ALARMING
> >
> >
> > After
> > several
> years
> > of trial in a killing case,
> > an actor was held guilty by the
> > court and
> > jail
> term
> > awarded. But, he got bail in
> a
> > few hours
> >
> from another judge. After
> > several years
> of trial in a
> > corruption
> > case, a
> > Chief
> Minister was found guilty and
> > awarded
> jail term and
> > hefty fine. But,
> > after a few months, a higher court
> judge
> > called her innocent
> > and acquitted
> >
> everyone involved totally. Now, one wonders
> > which judge is
> >
> right and which judge
> > is wrong.
> >
> >
> > While rich
> >
> politicians and cinema actors
> > seem to
> have the last laugh,
> > there are
> > thousands
> > of
> dharidhranarayanas in India
> > who stay in
> jail for lesser
> > crime for
> > several
> > years
> without being heard. Are they
> > not as
> much Indians as
> > the cinema actor
> > driving his car on a pavement dweller
> and rich
> > politician
> > indulging in corrupt
> > practices ? Are we settling down for
> this sort
> > of democracy
> > in India ?
> >
> >
> > An average common
> man
> > in
> > India,
> millions of whom do not have any political
> > affiliation have already
> > lost
> > faith in the
> politicians in power and bureaucracy. He
> > has been thinking that
> > the
> > judiciary is
> ultimate conscience keeper of the country.
> > But, when judiciary
> > give
> > judgements
> with so much of contradiction between one
> > judge and the other
> > and
> > providing
> bail and relief
> > to the
> > convicted actor and
> >
> politicians with
> > great speed and
> with
> > many judges in
> > India already having been
> > accused of
> > corrupt
> practices in the past, people
> >
> > tend to develop doubts about judiciary
> >
> > too.
> >
> > Now, what can
> a
> > common man do , if he loses faith
> in
> > politicians in power,
> > bureaucrats and
> >
> judges? It is alarming to think about such
> > situation and the
> >
> possibilities.
> > N.S.Venkataraman
> >
> >
> >
> > Post:
> > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
> >
> > Post:
> > "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
>
> >
> >
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Inline
> Attachment Follows-----
> >
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
> >
> >
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
> >
> >
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> >Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
> Post:
> "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit:
> "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
>
>Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
>Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
>Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
>WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
No comments:
Post a Comment