[HumJanenge] Re: Mr. Shailesh Gandhi.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 1976/2012 and C.M. No. 4266/2012 (for stay)
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.T.R.Andhyarujina, Sr.Advocate
with Mr.Kuldeep S.Parihar, Mr.H.S. Parihar and Mr.Soumik Ghosal, Advs.
versus
ASHWINI DIXIT ..... Respondent

O R D E R
10.04.2012

The CIC has rejected the submission on the ground that no reasons have
been advanced by this Court while granting stay and, therefore, it is
not possible for the commission to ascertain the same. This
observation of the CIC cannot be appreciated in as much as while
granting an ex-parte stay this Court is not obliged to record its
reasons or give justification for the same in every such case. Brief
reason already stand furnished in the initially passed stay orders.
Once a stay order has been passed by the Court all concerned are bound
to obey the same unless it is vacated.

Since various cases involving the same questions are repeatedly
arising on account of passing of similar orders by the learned CIC, I
direct the learned CIC to adjourn hearing in all such like cases which
involve the disclosure of (i) the inspection reports prepared by the
Reserve Bank of India; (ii) the notings in relation to inspection
proceedings conducted by the Reserve Bank of India; (iii) the board
meetings minutes of the Reserve Bank of India as well as concerned
banks,
and correspondence exchanged between the Reserve Bank of India and the
concerned banks."

PS:
Here is the link to SG's original order
http://indiankanoon.org/doc/132922648/