Re: [IAC#RG] FYI: LG finally forwards IAC's 900 cr. UIDAI land scam complaint to DDA

Well done Mr. Sarabjit and others for the sake of India. I congratulate for your efforts! We will distribute the news on FB too.
regards
G.Singh
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 8/2/13, Mr. Hemant Kshirsagar <hemantkshirsagar01@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] FYI: LG finally forwards IAC's 900 cr. UIDAI land scam complaint to DDA
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Cc: "sarbajit roy" <sroy.mb@gmail.com>, "Justice Kamleshwar Nath" <justicekn@gmail.com>, mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in, "Babubhai Vaghela" <vaghelabd@yahoo.com>, "Vidyut G K" <wide.aware@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, August 2, 2013, 12:55 PM

Congratulation Mr.
Sarbajit, 
Let god be with you, we are there always for your help and
our common war on corruption. One Thanks at least from one
person (me) for helping exposing scam.
BE MOTIVATED, GO AHEAD, HELP OUR
NATION!!

For our group, let us motivate people instead of
demotivating or stone pelting them... (Moderators please
publish this mail as I understand, that moral support on our
group is not accepted easily or published, but we must
upkeep moral of our list, if one person can do it everybody
can do it.)

Regards,Hemant Kshirsagar

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at
11:36 AM, India News <indianewsco@gmail.com>
wrote:

To
IACHQ - FYI:
LG
finally forwards IAC's 900 cr. UIDAI land scam complaint
to DDA

Murali Krishnan | India News
Political Bureau, Delhi, Thursay August 01,
2013, 23:12 pm (IST)

The Lieut Governor of Delhi (LG) has finally
forwarded today to the DDA the IAC National Convenor
Sarbajit Roy's
complaint of massive corruption in acquiring prime land by
the UIDAI
(Unique ID Authority of India) at throwaway prices due to
the site's
irregular use status. All the senior officers of the DDA,
including
DDA's Vigilance Director, had returned or refused to
accept IAC's
vigilance related complaint. The Delhi Development Authority
is an
autonomous statutory self financing authority set up under
an Act of
Parliament in 1956, but over the years has been converted
into an
extension of the LG's residence through a series of
confidential letters
issued by the Central Government under the said Act.
The text of India Against Corruption's
complaint alleging the UIDAI has been transferred prime
public land in
Central Delhi at throw-away rates in conjunction with
Delhi's land mafia
is reproduced below.
From:

Er. Sarbajit Roy.

National Convenor

India Against Corruption jan andolan

To:

Commissioner-cum-Secretary,

Delhi Development Authority

Sub:  Public Notice No.F.20(11)2012/MP dt.26.06.13
u/s.11A published in Indian Express e-paper on
30.06.2013

BY EMAIL

Respected Sir

Kindly find below my objections and/or
suggestions to the subject public notice for statutory
consideration
under sub-section 11-A(3) and otherwise

OBJECTIONS:

1) There is no reference to the specific site /
land use of the modification in the present Master Plan, ie
the
so-called MPD-2021, or at least I am unable to find it in
the MPD-2021
land-use plan available on the UDM website.

2) The public notice speaks of modifying the
Zonal Development Plan for Zone-D. I say there is no such
plan in
existence. To the best of my knowledge the ZDP-2021 for
Zone-D is not in
existence. The last I heard was that a known incompetent
private
planner, some Mr. Ribiero or suchlike, had drafted up such a
ZDP for the
NDMC and DUAC to suit the the land mafia, but it was so
patently
atrocious and self serving that it is yet to see the light
of day. So
please show me the referred ZDP-2021 for Zone-D as I am yet
to see it.
It is pertinent that I am a long time resident of Zone D
which, unlike
every other planning zone, has no ZDP and I fail to see why
I am being
discriminated against in planning issues.

3) I object that the lack of an up-do-date ZDP
for Zone-D is allowing some organisations to swallow land
notified for
public and semi-public use and convert them into govt
offices by misuse
of section 11A. The most blatant such example being APPU
GHAR which was
swallowed by Supreme Court and DMRC, and in which all the
public
objections opposing the CLU were CORRUPTLY ignored by DDA.
The SC used
the land to sell to its advocates to set up private law
chambers and the
DMRC put up a tall commercial building to house some
Railway Freight
Corporation.

4) I object that there is no such "authority"
known as UIDAI. The law to set it up is yet to be passed by
Parliament,
and the UIDAI is functioning, illegally, on the basis of an
EGOM
resolution whereby a private industrialist Shri Nandan
Nilekani of
INFOSYS was secretly appointed its Chairman without
following due
process and given the status of a Union Minister. I have
established
this under RTI, as I was the person who brought UIDAI within
ambit of
RTI as an extension of the Planning Commission. It is
pertinent that
when the Planning Commission received a copy of the CIC
order in my
case, they immediately asked Mr. Nilenkani and his team to
vacate their
offices within Planning Commission building within 48 hours.
UIDAI then
had to hire offices in Jeevan Bharati Building virtually
overnight. The
JPC (Joint Parliamentary Committee) has also objected to the
UIDAI and
said it is a useless body which should be scrapped.

5) It is thus clear that after I exposed UIDAI as being a
fraudy outfit, they have managed to CORRUPTLY
acquire a vacant plot of land in 2010-11 which is the
subject of this
CLU. It needs a CBI / CAG investigation as to who all in the
Ministry of
Urban Development or it's offices like L&DO / DDA
etc. transferred
the land which was Public/Semi-Public use in nature. It
needs to be seen
if the plot was acquired on commercial rates or it was a
concessional
allocation. The entire land acquisition / transfer file
should be
provide to objectors. There must be a CBI/CAG/ACB
investigation into the
modus operandi that the plot is acquired at a cheap rate
and then the
land mafia upgrades it to commercial use (UIDAI is a
semi-PRIVATE
concern) by bribing MoUD officers and ministers of UPA govt.
It is
pertinent that INFOSYS has aquired a 1,000 sq yard plot in
Vasant Vihar
(Zone-F) last year for about Rs. 105 crores, so the land
rate for a
prime plot in Zone D should not be less than Rs. 20 lakhs
per sq yard or
about Rs. 900 crores for a 4,40 sq yard plot.

6) This CLU change will have significant
alterations in local / site population density. Hence the
CLU must be
considered by the Central Government u/s 11A(2) only. The
DDA has no
role to play other than issuing the statutory notice.
Members of the
Authority have no role to play either, and their
participation in any
Board of Enquiry and Hearing is a breach of statutory
provision which
shall be reported to the CBI and the ACB.

7) The UIDAI already has a massive Headquarter
at Bangalore / Karnataka. I seem to recall that the ZDP/
MP2021  and the
NCR plans not only mandates that no new Government offices
are to come
up in Delhi, but also that the existing ones are to shift
out of Delhi.
Therefore what kind of precedent is being set by such
CORRUPT CLU public
notices

8) Please take clear notice that the citizens
could not object when the DDA approved numerous spot CLUs to
oblige the
Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India to grab land
all over
Delhi to accommodate their advocate's chambers only
because their judges
are a law unto to themselves under the Judges Inquiry Act
and the SC
judgments. However, for such corrupt CLUs like the instant
one, DDA
officers shall and will be reported to the CBI/CAG/ACB if
they persist
in rolling over to approve perverse CLUs to grossly favour
semi-private
irregular operators like UIDAI who are being facilitated to
grab PUBLIC
land at throwaway prices.

9) Not only is UIDAI so confident that their
CLU will be approved, they have already conducted a design
competition
for their building - the winning bid for which seems to have
a hugely
tall structure well over the 15 meter height limit. It is
thus clear
that UIDAI / land mafia have advance information about 
impending Master
Plan changes to allow this. This is also definitely a
matter which
falls for the CBI etc. to investigate considering that the
sub-zone
(which may be D4 or D5) is a low profile zone with many
heritage
structures. [http://www.architizer.com/en_us/projects/view/uidai-headquarters-at-delhi/40953/#.UdE7qpxR7Dw]



10) Accordingly, I SUGGEST that this CLU be scrapped
and/or returned to the MoUD.

yours faithfully
 
Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,

India Against Corruption, jan andolan


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"

Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"

Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"

Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user

WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in