Tuesday, October 28, 2014

[IAC#RG] FW: CORRUPT POLITICIAN HAS THE LAST LAUGH AND JUDICIARY BECOME LAUGHING STOCK

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

What are they waiting for . Step::_

1.     Convene a special secession of parliament. Preferably a joint secssion.

2.     Just pass one bill nullifying Supreme courts judgment of disqualifying convicted persons , to continue as MPs and MLAS pending their appeal .

3.     Just do not take up the appeal.

4.     Use the great expertise and knowledge , experience of lallu for the good of Bharat that is Hindustan .  How can we afford to waste the management skil of such brilliant persons like Lallu . Wake up India . 

 

From: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net [mailto:indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net] On Behalf Of P.Mohana Chandran
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:53 PM
To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] CORRUPT POLITICIAN HAS THE LAST LAUGH AND JUDICIARY BECOME LAUGHING STOCK

 

Mrs.Indira Gandhi's election was set aside by Allahabad High Court for electoral malpractice.Justice Krishna Iyer,granted stay of the judgement.This facilitated Mrs Gandhi to get the Representation of Peoples' Act amended with retrospective effect so that spending money over and above the stipulated limit even by a recognised party which was an electoral malpractice ceased to be a malpractice resulting in the Allahabad High Court judgement getting reversed.We cannot rule out the possibility of the Prevention of Corruption Act getting amended excluding members of Legislatures from the clutches of the law.As Lalluji.Jayalalithaji and OmPrkash Choutalaji are presently not able to 'remote control' the Central Government, Prevention of Corruption Act may not be amended to save them.They may have to work out their remedy before the Appellate Courts.If a politician receives gifts and become a Billionaire with such gifts,he can not be proceeded under  Prevention of Corruption Act in view of the change in law brought in to save some Big  politicians who were able to remote control the then Government at the Centre.Till the accused persons (whether politician or otherwise) exhaust the last chance of Appeal,let us not treat them as criminal.In Tamilnadu there is objection to to keeping of Jayalalithaji's portraits in public offices.As per the existing guidelines portraits of some leaders like Gandhiji,Arinjar Anna and serving CM can be kept in public Offices.TN Government can amend the guidelines to include former CMs in the list so that the controversy can be avoided.Ofcourse Karunanidhiji's portrait too can be kept in such a situation.As a person born and living in Tamilnadu ,I am extremely happy that Jayalalithaji was allowed to comeout on bail.When she was in Jail,each day was a nightmare for us.

P.Mohana Chandran,

 

 

 

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:

Even though there is no presumption of innocence after conviction so long as an appeal provided by law due to experience of coviction being found to be erroneous in many cases there is no presumption of guilt also and therefore grant of bail pending appeal has to be fairly liberal.

Sent from my iPad


On Oct 22, 2014, at 6:33 PM, ~Rájiv Pátěl <rpatel.fffie@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Kirity Roy

Get your facts clear. In the present case the ACCUSED person has been already tried and found GUILTY and therefore the person is no more an accused but a CONVICT. Unlike the parameters to be considered while granting bail to an accused person/s parameters to grant bail to a convicted person are different

 

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Kirity Roy <kirityroy@gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, I do agree with the understanding of Mr. Shanti Bhushan. 

Accused person in a criminal trial should not be treated as guilty. It is the duty of prosecution (State) to prove him / her guilty before the court. 

Are we going to establish "presumption of guilt" in he tune of police / state ?? Are we going deny "Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty" ?? 

 

At the same time I must support strongly the main message of Mr. N S Venkataraman of Nandini Voice. 

 

On 21 October 2014 21:52, Shanti Bhushan <shantibhush@gmail.com> wrote:

I do not see any objection to the grant of bail pending appeal provided it is conditional on the appeal being quickly heard and decided.

Sent from my iPad

 

--
Kirity Roy
Secretary
Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha
(MASUM)
&
National Convenor (PACTI)
Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity
40A, Barabagan Lane (4th Floor)
Balaji Place
Shibtala
Srirampur
Hooghly
PIN- 712203
Tele-Fax - +91-33-26220843
Phone- +91-33-26220844 / 0845
e. mail : kirityroy@gmail.com
Web: www.masum.org.in

 


Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

 

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)