Was NAC ecer able to meet the requirements of Constitutional scheme of things? Wasn't everything wholly arbitrary? And continues to be so? Why no primetime debate on that? Not on what it did or didn't. Not on its role vs that if PMO. Why no Statutory Body through widely debated legislation for any major task be formulated,if ever a notio for such a need had crossed someone's mind? Hundred valid questions arise and answers to the same need to come in rational/factual manner. I plead with honourable IAC members once again to raise such questions,say through crowdsourcing,and I plead with Sh Saerbjit to compile the same and seek answers thereto. Will RTI help? Will PMO help? Will finally Judiciary help? S P Mathur
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:14:43
To: indiaresists<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Subject: [IAC#RG] Sonia Gandhi is still NAC Chairperson ???
While most of India thought that the Gandhis (which included "Vadras")
would slink away to some pleasant Caribbean beach to spend their
trillions, IAC decided to investigate when exactly Sonia Gandhi gave
up advising the Prime Minister
The official answer we received in RTI (attached) is that the NAC is
still a Committee of the PMO, that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is still its
Chairperson, and that the Prime Minister of India and the BJP Govt
still calls on the Queen for advice.
God save India.!!!!
Official Links to NAC's RTI reply to IAC :-
http://nac.nic.in/members/soniagandhi.php
http://nac.nic.in/secretriat.php
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment