Re: [IAC#RG] In the matter of "Gory sexual assault by retired SC judge"

Dear Sarbjit Sir,

FOR INFO:

A lady (wife of an IPS officer) has moved an application (in relation
to this case) under 156(3) before CJM Lucknow, details can be seen
here: http://bhadas4media.com/state/up/lucknow/15852-2013-11-16-13-00-30.html

Regards
Ambrish

On 11/18/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
> IAC was appalled to read in the ToI today some really offensive statements
> that the Petitioner in the case (ML Sharma) is purported to have made
> against ladies.
>
> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-11-17/india/44161730_1_sexual-harassment-allegation-india
>
> "He added that he has "learnt through ancient books which has already
> disclosed and established several times that (a) lady never speak (the)
> truth. Even for a short benefit or for revenge for denial (of) her demand
> she can go up to any extent for revenge. No one can control her
> revenge/greed. Upon disclosure of truth she puts herself as a poor helpless
> in the world. All empires and fight happened due to her ego and greed
> (sic).""
>
> IAC promptly contacted Adv. Sharma to confirm if he had filed such rotten
> things, and if so IAC would intervene before the Court to defend the
> nation's ladies from the likes of him.
>
> To his credit, Adv Sharma replied back promptly explaining that a
> journalist had further circulated an old preliminary draft (usually given
> in advance to them to prepare questions for a TV interview). He has
> provided IAC a soft copy of the final writ as filed (subject to registry
> objections and corrections) by him which is attached.
>
> IAC agrees with Sharma that the evidence must be placed in public domain,
> such as on the website of the SC to "*name them and shame them*". The role
> of the Attorney General is once again quite dubious if what ML Sharma says
> is true.
>
> The identity of the judge has been pinned down, all it requires now is for
> the lady to say it.
>
> Sarbajit
>