Wednesday, June 23, 2010

[rti_india] Re: Info panel delivers first split verdict


Oh so you were referring to the other case case against him ;-)

The one where a disgruntled babu obtained via RTI the "confidential"
remarks ANT as Secy DoPT had written about him (in pre-RTI days), and where the PIO failed to issue 3rd party notice to ANT who had a legitimate expectation of confidentiality, and especially where there was no public interest warranting disclosure over the rights of 3rd parties. <wink>


--- In, C K Jam <rtiwanted@...> wrote:
> Sarbajit,
> It was a private suit against ANT for writing malicious comments
> defaming a candidate, while IC ANT was the Secretary DoPT.
> RTIwanted
> --- On Wed, 6/23/10, sarbajitr <sroy1947@...> wrote:
> From: sarbajitr <sroy1947@...>
> Subject: [rti_india] Re: Info panel delivers first split verdict
> To:
> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 5:02 PM
> If I recall correctly, its a breach of privilege matter of Kerala Legislature originating during ANT's tenure in DoPT. Since the decision was taken in an official capacity his legal fees are
being paid by the State through his present employer.
> Perhaps the "rtikerala" yahoogroup which Hariraj runs will know
more about this.

Recent Activity:

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.



No comments:

Post a Comment