Previous Chief of CIC had deliberately given the wrong orders in the Court cases.
e.g. in the case of soft copy , CIC had rejected the appeal on the pretext the Court rules supersede RTI ACt, 2005. Totally illogical / illegal decisions. Now the same Courts are giving soft information free of cost to parties . Although Court rules are not changed.
Secondly There is huge pendency before, Chief of CIC, if Chief wants good decisions , he should transfer all the news cases to Commissioners ( who has lower pending cases) of important department Like PMO. CVC, Supreme Court .
Regarding the Bigger Bench to decide the Court Rules.
I had find out today One Commissioner (Related to PM) , do not think it is crime to take bribe at the cost of Nation . Like 2 G scam . information about this matter (bribe / corruption is personal information of bribe taker and exempted u/s 8(1)(j)
Similarly , there is no need of the Public to follow up their cases , because Government Officers are good and Govt Check And Balances are good.
with regards
rakesh gupta
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
To:
The Chief Information Commissioner of India
August Kranti Bhawan,
New Delhi
BY EMAIL
Respected Sir,
I am given to understand that there are a batch of matters pending for adjudication before Shri Shailesh Gandhi on important questions of law pertaining to the rule making powers of the High Court of Delhi concerning the coverage of subordinate judiciary of NCT of Delhi under RTI Act.
Considering the nature of the legal propositions being urged by the parties, which are also likely to have far reaching consequences on the autonomy of the CIC itself, I request you to kindly assign this matter to a larger bench of the Commission and take into account the views of all stake holders after public notice as per previous precedents (as in say the further fees of 7(3)full bench decision).
Yours faithfully
Sarbajit Roy
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069
No comments:
Post a Comment