Re: [HumJanenge] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: Intemperate language used in decisions of the Commission

Yes. President is competent authority. But, must lodge complaint with substantial evidences. For, due investigation by Supreme Court. --  (Babubhai Vaghela) C 202, Shrinandnagar V, Makarba Road Vejalpur, Ahmedabad - 380051 M -  94276 08632 http://twitter.com/BabubhaiVaghela About me in Annexure at - http://bit.ly/9xsHFj http://www.youtube.com/user/vaghelabd (Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005) http://groups.google.com/group/Right-to-Information-Act-2005/about?hl=en --- On Tue, 3/22/11, sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> wrote: From: sandeep kumar <drsandgupta@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] PUBLIC GRIEVANCE: Intemperate language used in decisions of the Commission To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2011, 3:29 PM Can we file a complaint to president of india for removal of mr gandhi? On 3/22/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr Gupta > > Is this deliberate or are you some kind of confused retard ? > > The matter which is sub-judice is whether DSGMC is a public authority or > not. When this issue is pending before a superior court it is grossly > contemptuous for any public servant  (especially a lower tribunal like Mr > Gandhi who has adjudicated on the question)  to pass intemperate comments > (in orders) concerning a party in the matter - and especially where CIC was > DELETED as a party in the matter. > > As I have said, it is a matter for the CIC to sort out internally, as > citizens we are only here to assist the CIC to see that "justice" is done. > > If the members of this house wish I can point out umpteen specific instances > where Mr Gandhi has *BETRAYED* the RTI movement. > > *FOR INSTANCE WILL MR GANDHI DENY (ON ANY PUBLIC FORUM) THAT HE WAS AN > AUTHOR OF THE 250 WORD + 1 SUBJECT LIMIT ON RTI APPLICATIONS DRAFT RTI RULE. > * > This is an open challenge from me to him !!! > > Sarbajit. > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:25 PM, M.K. Gupta <mkgupta100@yahoo.co.in> wrote: > >> Let the PIO or SGPC file a contempt petition before the Court and in that >> eventuallity, it will be for Shri Shailesh Gandhi, IC and CIC to defend >> the >> action in question and all the doubts will be addressed.  Why r v so much >> such worried for Mr. Gandhi and he must have given the decision after >> considering all pros and cons. >> >> However, if v buy argument about the matter being sub-judice, in most of >> the cases, no body will get any information. (Remember cases of CWG and 2G >> scams).  The PIOs and Public Authorities will file a case before the court >> and will drag the matter for years to stop the dissimination of >> information. >> >> I recall, in one of the decisions, Mr. Gandhi has pronounced that matter >> being subjudice is no ground to deny the information unless there is a >> specific stay and the such question will only arise if after the decision >> of >> the CIC, PA approach to the Court to stay the order of the CIC or SICs. >> >> If member want, I can give detail or full decision for their benefit. >> > -- Dr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta 989, Sector 15-A, Opposite bishnoi Colony, Hisar-125001, INDIA Phone: 91-99929-31181