Wha you say is very correct; but apart from the big 'BUT' in the Congress,it cannotbedenied that at presentModi is ridingat the top inpopularesteem thatno other chiel minister from any other stat or any other person is riding.
V. S. Sardesai
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 29/7/13, Vinod Kumar <kv08535@yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [media_monitor5] Re: [IAC#RG] "I am Narendra Modi's Wife"
To: "media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com" <media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com>, "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net" <indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>, "issuesonline worldwide@yahoogroups.com" <issuesonline_worldwide@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, 29 July, 2013, 6:36 PM
What Mr Sarbajit Roy is saying
may be true. All these people he is talking about are even
more capable than what he describes. But, there is a big
"BUT" in Congress. Being a dynastic party, there
is room only for sycophancy in it. The controlling figure is
fixed -- there is no vacancy there. That position cannot be
challenged.
Vinod K
From: S kumar
<kumar_8134@yahoo.com>
To:
"indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>; "media
monitor5@yahoogroups.com"
<media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com>; "issuesonline
worldwide@yahoogroups.com"
<issuesonline_worldwide@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday,
July 29, 2013 8:41 AM
Subject:
[media_monitor5] Re: [IAC#RG] "I am Narendra
Modi's Wife"
It
appears Sarbajit Roy is totally biased and prejudiced
against Narendra Mody, for his own reasons. But he cannot
stop the tide that follows Mody in every meet and might turn
to a Tsunami destroying all anti-Mody forces by the time of
elections. The
very presence of lakhs of listeners in pin drop silence
ranging from educationists, economists, business tycoons,
doctors et al. to hear him with awe wherever he goes, shows
the immense popularity esp. among the youth of the Country.
BJP does not bring the people in hundreds of truck and bus
loads paying each Rs.200 per day as Congress does in every
meet to be addressed by any Congress leader. Where is a
Congress leader intelligent enough to give an ex tempore
speech with figures at
finger
tips? Raul
Vinci and his mom could only read the speeches written by
others and cannot face the media as they are blank on most
matters.
From: Sarbajit Roy
<sroy.mb@gmail.com>
To:
indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
Sent: Monday,
July 29, 2013 5:16 PM
Subject: Re:
[IAC#RG] "I am Narendra Modi's Wife"
Dear Mr Sardesai,
1) The present CMs of all Gujarat's surrounding states (
Maharashtra,
Madhy Pradesh and Rajasthan) are all equally competent
persons to
serve as Prime Minister of India. In some cases they are
even better
than NaMo in many respects. Since it is an apolitical debate
let me
take up examples of
a) Mr Shivraj Singh Chauhan (BJP CM of MP) whose personal
popularity
index seems to be much higher in his state that Namo in
Gujarat. Mr.
Chauhan has the added advantage of extensive ministerial
experience at
the Centre, and is also a team player, polished and
consensus oriented
person unlike a divisive autocrat NamO who is (as per ABV)
"uncouth".
b) Mr Prithviraj Chavan, comes from an old Congress
political family,
is an experienced technocrat from
India and USA with
deep experience
at the Centre as an MP and MoS (PMO) and enjoys a
clean reputation.
Is also a team player, but may be a little junior in
Congress to be PM
(P.Chiddu is the non-Gandhi family choice if prince-duffer
is
unacceptable to Congress allies or fails to win his seat).
c) Nothing has to be said about Mr Ashok Gehlot. His last
State budget
had even the state BJP applauding it.
d) Mr. Naveen Patnaik is also an interesting person to
consider for a
3rd front PM.
On 7/29/13, vasant sardesai <vasant_sardesai@yahoo.co.in>
wrote:
> Those who have opened this opic are not interested in
th eidscussion as to
> who can make better India than Modi;they are more
interested to somehow
> dicredit Modi.
>
> V. S. Sardesai
>
--------------------------------------------
> On Mon,
29/7/13, OM KANOONGO <omkanoongo@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] "I am Narendra Modi's
Wife"
> To: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>
> Date: Monday, 29 July, 2013, 12:38 AM
>
> Amazed to observe
> discussion on a non-issue. Neither Modi nor
Jasodaben have
> any complaint. Let there be discussion as to who
can make a
> better India than
> Modi.RegardsCA.
> O P Kanoongo
> From:
Madhav Nalapat
> <mdnalapat@gmail.com>
> To:
> indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> Sent: Sunday,
> July 28, 2013 7:12 AM
> Subject: Re:
> [IAC#RG] "I am Narendra Modi's Wife"
>
> Modi was opposed to getting married but had to
agree to the
> ceremony
> in view of parental fiat.But after obeying his
parents,he
> showed his
> disagreement by leaving the pandal and straight
away going
> off to the
> Himalayas for a lengthy pilgrimage,according to
the
> Kamath-Randeri
> book.While Jasodaben needs to be viewed with
sympathy,as she
> was
> apparently innocent of the knowledge that her
spouse to be
> did
not
> want to wed her or any other woman,the fact
remains that no
> person can
> be forced to accept another as his or her
spouse,and that
> such a
> person is within his or her rights in refusing to
enter into
> conjugal
> relations.Modi has never married again,so he
> certainly cannot be
> accused of bigamy.Nor was there any ill-treatment
or any
> false promise
> made by him.He wanted out and said so from the
start.Is
> such
> persistence in holding on to one's views a
crime? Can we
> forget
> Mahatma Gandhi,who said Pakistan would get formed
only over
> his "dead
> body" ? Had the Mahatma held firm to such a
> resolve,history would have
> been different
>
> To some friends,it may be mentioned that Sarbajit
has a
> right to be
> heard,and with courtesy,although our own views
may differ
> from his
>
> regards
>
> Madhav
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Joshi NM <naishadhjoshi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello Sarabjit,
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Why use such useless media links without
original
> research? Why do you speak
> > for a lady named as Jasodaben with you have
never
> communicated? Are you a
> >
> self-appointed advocate of Jasodaben, fighting
pro bono
> without any public
> > cause? Why waste your keystrokes and energy
where you
> ultimately csn seek no
>
> relief? Are you seeking
restitution of conjugal right
> or compensation for
> > the victim? No. You're not. You
can not. Full
> stop. Enjoy the TRP you are
> > generating- positive or otherwise.
Sonia mem is
> much better on domestic
> > count than Namo, having survived conjugal
rights till
> the party to contract
> > survived! Though Hindu marriage Act not
applicable to
> the contract. Research
> > Olof Palme to link why two PM suddenly
departed.
> Enjoy.
> >
> > On Jul 27, 2013 3:47 PM, "Sarbajit
Roy"
> <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It is the under-informed people who give
the
> ANTI-CONGRESS
movement a bad
>
>> name.
> >>
> >>
> Most AK / Namo bhagats uniformly have the IQ of
Rahul
> Gandhi. God has
> >> also given keyboards to every monkey
these days in
> the hope that his
> >> name will be spelt correctly
(eventually).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1753768/report-rape-case-against-rahul-gandhi-quashed
> >>
> >> Now if you want to say that the Supreme
Court is
> corrupt, then we can
> >> most definitely discuss that on this
list with
> specific examples.
> >>
> >> @RahulBagaria, the issue was never about
Namo's
>
marital status
but
> >> about how he treats women in general and
his wife
> in particular.
> >>
> >> Sarbajit
> >>
> >> On 7/27/13, Arti Choraria <arti.choraria@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> > Atleast he is not a rapist like
rahul gandi.
> Ask rahul gandhi who is
> >> > sukanya devi.
> >>
> >> > On Jul 27, 2013 2:45 PM,
"rahul
> bagaria" <bagaria.r@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry to interrupt you with
your pathetic
> views, but what I believe is
>
>> >> ,
> >> >> this is not
at all a point of concern
> whether Modiji is married or
> >> >> bachelor.The point of concern
is better
> future of this country . I am a
> >> >> strong follower of IAC but what
hurts me
> is you are degrading every
> >> >> party,
> >> >> which is not a sign of healthy
democracy.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks & Regards
> >> >>
> >> >> Rahul Bagaria
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:40
PM, <ssr.singh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Dear All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There cannot be more
degrading and
> personalised debate as this one.
> >> >>> Painful. Regds. SR
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> SR
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com>
> >> >>> Sender: indiaresists-request@lists.riseup.net
> >> >>> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013
13:01:19
> >> >>> To: indiaresists<indiaresists@lists.riseup.net>;
> <
> >> >>> info@narendramodiplans.com>
> >> >>> Reply-To: indiaresists@lists.riseup.net
> >> >>> Subject: [IAC#RG] "I am
Narendra
> Modi's Wife"
> >> >>>
> >>
>>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >> >>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >> >>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
> >>
>>>
> >> >>> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >>> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >>> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >> >>> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >> >>> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >> >> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >> >> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >> >> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> >> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> >> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> >> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> >> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
> >
> >
> > Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> > Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> > Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> > Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> > WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
>
>
>
> --
> M D Nalapat
> Vice-Chair,Manipal Advanced Research Group,UNESCO
Peace
> Chair &
> Professor of Geopolitics,Manipal University
>
>
> U26C/8 DLF QE-III,Gurgaon-122002
> Haryana State,India
> tel: (91) 9810067917
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
>
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
> Exit:
"indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
> Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
> Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
> WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
>
Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
__._,_.___
Reply
via web post
Reply to sender
Reply to group
Start a New
Topic
Messages in this
topic
(3)
Recent
Activity:
Visit Your Group
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback
.
__,_._,___
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment