Saturday, February 28, 2015

Re: [IAC#RG] Amartya Sen’s outburst after being denied second term

Amartya Sen commented about Modi "winning an election does not mean he could prove to be effective" (something like that,as i can recollect)!  I would  say the same thing about Amartya Sen " Getting nobel prize or Bharat Ratna" too was an erroneous decision (or at the most a fluke) by who so ever the authorities are! Sachin Tendulkar too aid through ads to promote commodities despite his affluence and being bestowed with Bharat Ratna!! All these prove that they are all beneficiaries of the thoughtlessness of those responsibel!!


On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 8:41 PM, Mani Gahatraj <makghat4@gmail.com> wrote:


It looks like Mr Sen has viewed his personal gain or non gain as a barometer of academic freedom and performance of Modi Government. Anybody is fee to criticise the govt of the day but  as a Noble Laureate what has Mr Sen offered to his country, has he suggested any blue print or a road map or a paper on improving the economy of the country?
Sad that an academician like him is behaving like a cheap politician and NDTV is very happy to air his comments and criticism of the Government and one can see it so clearly what it all means.  

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:24 PM, R. Dua <r.dua1234@gmail.com> wrote:
Agree with Shri Venkataraman ji and Shri Subramaniam ji.
If my memory serves me right mr sen is a noble laureate!
Just delivery of lectures is not everything.How one conducts oneself when denied is the real test.
Regards to all.
On 22 Feb 2015 01:31, "Venkatraman Ns" <nsvenkatchennai@gmail.com> wrote:
  To
India Against Corruption                            

                                                           Amartya  Sen's  outburst  after  being  denied  second  term
 
On being denied  second term as  Chancellor of Nalanda University, Amartsya Sen has  criticised  the Modi government  and accused it of threatening the academic freedom.  Obviously,  Amartya Sen   would not have said this if he has been given a second term. His reaction sounds like that of a typical politician in India, who views any situation  considering  his personal interests.
Amartya Sen has completed his term as Chancellor of Nalanda University and his term has not been disturbed in the middle. Certainly, the government  has the duty, responsibility and authority to decide as to who should be the next chancellor and the decision need not always go in faour of incumbent. Person like Amartya Sen, a Nobel  laurete who gets lot of publicity in the Indian media , should understand this prerogative of the government.
By no stretch of imagination  , one can say that not providing a second term for the Chancellor amount to threaten the academic freedom. Certainly, there are people in India who are equally suitable or even may be more suitable than Amartya  Sen for the job and the government is entitled to examine such possibilities.
It is unfortunate that Amartya Sen has viewed the issues relating to academic freedom in India in such a restricted way such as posting of Chancellor.
It is known that Amartya Sen   has given an impression that he is a pledged critic of Narendra Modi  and his recent interview in the media not only talks about his not  being   given a second term but also highly critical remarks about Modi's governance, which is unwarranted from a person holding position as Chancellor of University.
N.S.Venkataraman
Nandini Voice For The Deprived
twitter : @nsvchennai
 
 
 
 

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Post: "indiaresists@lists.riseup.net"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in




Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)