Sorry. There is an error. The first sentence of the message should be corrected to read as - "If the civil society members in the draft committee are "biased" in
your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that would benefit them."
S. Anoop Kumar.
your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that would benefit them."
S. Anoop Kumar.
----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Anoop Kumar" <s.anoopku...@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 24, 5:03 pm
Subject: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005
Dear Mr. Sarabjit Roy,
If the civil society members in the draft committee are unbiased in
your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they
are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that
would benefit them.
You are disputing the very essence of Lok Pal Bill when majority of
Indians are thinking that Lok Pal is what is required and we are
already late in having such a law in place. And majority Indians
think, wish, hope and pray that such a bill would bring in some change
in governance, responsibility and accountability in governance and
delivery mechanism.
And regarding the other alternatives to the Lok Pal Bill quoted by
you, you know for sure they are not practical and implementable and
still you suggest them. I see a day dreamer in you. It clearly
appears you are personally against a set of people and you fail to see
the good intentions of these people. And you will oppose anything
and everything these people would attempt to do. Just for the sake of
opposing. Even if they can bring in some good to the society.
Regards,
S. Anoop Kumar.
On Apr 24, 11:43 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
Date: Apr 24, 5:03 pm
Subject: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!
To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005
Dear Mr. Sarabjit Roy,
If the civil society members in the draft committee are unbiased in
your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they
are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that
would benefit them.
You are disputing the very essence of Lok Pal Bill when majority of
Indians are thinking that Lok Pal is what is required and we are
already late in having such a law in place. And majority Indians
think, wish, hope and pray that such a bill would bring in some change
in governance, responsibility and accountability in governance and
delivery mechanism.
And regarding the other alternatives to the Lok Pal Bill quoted by
you, you know for sure they are not practical and implementable and
still you suggest them. I see a day dreamer in you. It clearly
appears you are personally against a set of people and you fail to see
the good intentions of these people. And you will oppose anything
and everything these people would attempt to do. Just for the sake of
opposing. Even if they can bring in some good to the society.
Regards,
S. Anoop Kumar.
On Apr 24, 11:43 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
No comments:
Post a Comment