On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
Your statements are grossly objectionable.
1) It is EASY to find competent people who are absolutely
incorruptible and without any credible allegations against them.
2) The issue is not about the LokPak Bill's contents or the fashion
it is brought about, BUT about the NEED for it in the first place.
3) Why should we the people of India settle for "RELATIVELY
LESS CORRUPT or CONTROVERSIAL PEOPLE" ??
You should reconsider the wisdom of statements you make in a
public forum.,
Sarbajit
On Apr 22, 8:56 am, Sankar Pani <sankarprasadp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we start finding faults with each and every person, then only god if any
> will be eligible in your scale to the Drafting committee.At the present
> juncture we can choose relatively less corrupt or less controversial people
> but never possible to find a person who do not have any such allegation. to
> me it seems that we have to accept the best in the existing committee and
> and should judge the objective of the committee.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:14 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Satishji
>
> > For the same reason that a mongoose wants to kill a snake.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Apr 22, 8:27 am, Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsat...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Dear Sarbajit
>
> > > Why u want to kill drafting committee?
>
> > > S.K.Kapoor
>
> > > ________________________________
> > > sense ?
>
> --
> Sankar Prasad Pani
> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
> India
> PIN-751007
> Cell- 9437279278http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
--
Sankar Prasad Pani
A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
India
PIN-751007
Cell- 9437279278
http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment