Re: [HumJanenge] Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!

Can some one tell us the fault of Justice Santosh Hegde and why the demand for his resignation is being made?  It is not fact that the nation is proud of him for conducting raids, unearthing blacke money, tacking mining mafia, daring even the Chief Minister for the alleged charges.     --- On Mon, 25/4/11, chandra jain <ckjaininindia@yahoo.com> wrote: From: chandra jain <ckjaininindia@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [HumJanenge] Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!! To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Cc: parivartanindia@gmail.com, kiranbedi2005@yahoo.co.in, debasish.pramanik@gmail.com, tripathidk@yahoo.com, msisodia@gmail.com, fattechand@yahoo.com, sshanbhag_2000@yahoo.com, sankarprasadpani@gmail.com, s.anoopkumar@gmail.com Date: Monday, 25 April, 2011, 11:24 AM I think it is a case of severe heartburn & nothing else.   This drafting committee has  gathered a lot of national prestige & these five 'civil society' leaders have suddenly come under limelight. Other activists feel they should also be on some such committee.   I can only remind all that these five eminent 'civil society' leaders did their homework well, they presented a specific plan of action to the society & the government, worked for its implementation & garnered huge public support. It is only a beginning - the drafting committee has to come up with an acceptable draft with all its intricacies & that bill has to go through the complete legislative process before it can become a law. Other activists can start working on their possible roles in all these subsequent activities, if they want to be associated with this particular anti-graft law only. If they have better ideas/suggestions for the Lokpal Bill, these can be sent to the drafting committee & there is a mechanism to take notice of these suggestions from the 'civil society'.    I am sure that if another group works diligently on another idea, say electoral reforms or picks up something else & comes up with a clear cut plan of action & is able to gather public support, they will be able to corner equal or more publicity & get appointed to more powerful committees.   Instead of denigrating the work of these five or finding faults in their characters, let us work on other badly needed reforms.    Chandra K Jain 93124 39464 INDIA From: S. Anoop Kumar <s.anoopkumar@gmail.com> To: humjanenge@googlegroups.com Cc: parivartanindia@gmail.com; kiranbedi2005@yahoo.co.in; debasish.pramanik@gmail.com; tripathidk@yahoo.com; msisodia@gmail.com; fattechand@yahoo.com; sshanbhag_2000@yahoo.com; sankarprasadpani@gmail.com; s.anoopkumar@gmail.com Sent: Sun, April 24, 2011 6:13:26 PM Subject: [HumJanenge] Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!! Sorry.  There is an error.   The first sentence of the message should be corrected to read as - "If the civil society members in the draft committee are "biased" in your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that would benefit them." S. Anoop Kumar.       ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Anoop Kumar" <s.anoopku...@gmail.com> Date: Apr 24, 5:03 pm Subject: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!! To: HumJanenge RTI India Right to Information Act 2005 Dear Mr. Sarabjit Roy, If the civil society members in the draft committee are unbiased in your opinion, then perhaps you have an answer as to which side they are inclined towards and what are their selfish considerations that would benefit them. You are disputing the very essence of Lok Pal Bill when majority of Indians are thinking that Lok Pal is what is required and we are already late in having such a law in place. And majority Indians think, wish, hope and pray that such a bill would bring in some change in governance, responsibility and accountability in governance and delivery mechanism. And regarding the other alternatives to the Lok Pal Bill quoted by you, you know for sure they are not practical and implementable and still you suggest them. I see a day dreamer in you. It clearly appears you are personally against a set of people and you fail to see the good intentions of these people. And you will oppose anything and everything these people would attempt to do. Just for the sake of opposing. Even if they can bring in some good to the society. Regards, S. Anoop Kumar. On Apr 24, 11:43 am, Sarbajit Roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote: