Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!

Hi,

When you see writing on the wall, you only negotiate for the best terms. e.g. GATT agreement signed by FM MM singh is the example, when only best negotiation was the available option to India.

similarly, JanLokpal Bill is written on wall. Now how best tp get the law enacted is the focus area.

Digvijay Singh, Kapil Sibbal & Manu Singhvi are out there to speak for derailment.

Kalmadi & Dixit are not called for inquiry. Supreme court is shouting at Govt. for names of money launderers.

So, better is to get Lokpals working ASAP.

loop-holes may be plugged as and when need arises.

numerous laws are enacted without active discussions in legislature houses. Numerous Bills are killed for extraneous reasons.

Even RTI Act & its implementation is not free from controversies.

Consumer Forums blatantly violate section 13 (3A) of Consumer protection act & give judgment after 5-7 years, without recording reasons for delay.

let the lokpal act come in force with sharp teeth. Let no excuse stand in the way for its coming into force.

regards.

-Joshi NM

On 22 April 2011 10:43, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

Your statements are grossly objectionable.

1) It is EASY to find competent people who are absolutely
incorruptible and without any credible allegations against them.

2) The issue is not about the LokPak Bill's contents or the fashion
it is brought about, BUT about the NEED for it in the first place.

3) Why should we the people of India settle for "RELATIVELY
LESS CORRUPT or CONTROVERSIAL PEOPLE" ??
You should reconsider the wisdom of statements you make in a
public forum.,

Sarbajit

On Apr 22, 8:56 am, Sankar Pani <sankarprasadp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we start finding faults with each and every person, then only god if any
> will be eligible in your scale to the Drafting committee.At the present
> juncture we can choose relatively less corrupt or less controversial people
> but never possible to find a person who do not have any such allegation. to
> me it seems that we have to accept the best in the existing committee and
> and should judge the objective of the committee.
>
>
>

> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:14 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Satishji
>
> > For the same reason that a mongoose wants to kill a snake.
>
> > Sarbajit
>
> > On Apr 22, 8:27 am, Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsat...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Dear Sarbajit
>
> > > Why u want to kill drafting committee?
>
> > > S.K.Kapoor
>
> > > ________________________________
> > > sense ?
>
> --
> Sankar Prasad Pani
> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
> India
> PIN-751007
> Cell- 9437279278http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/