Re: [HumJanenge] Re: Why Santosh Hegde MUST quit !!!

Dear Sankar

As I have already asked the concerned Ministry, I need to know why say
Mr Shanti Bhushan or Mr Anna Hazare is "cleaner" than me. Or
conversely why I am "dirtier" / "blacker" than they are. It is only
when every clean and honest citizen of India starts formally demanding
to know these things (as we are entitled to demand to know in law)
that there will be transparency in public appointments and clean
people will be selected.

Tomorrow if DoPT suggests Mr Shanti Bhushan or Mr Anna Hazare as
Chief Vigilance Commissioner should we accept this like little sheep ?

Sarbajit

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Sankar Pani
<sankarprasadpani@gmail.com> wrote:
> could u please suggest few names who do not have any allegation and are
> absolutely clean and perfect also have competency. It would be better in the
> interest of the nation if you have anything to the contents of the bill else
> will just frustrate the purpose of your dream of absolute corruption free
> nation.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:43 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Your statements are grossly objectionable.
>>
>> 1) It is EASY to find competent people who are absolutely
>> incorruptible and without any credible allegations against them.
>>
>> 2) The issue is not about the LokPak Bill's contents or the fashion
>> it is brought about, BUT about the NEED for it in the first place.
>>
>> 3) Why should we the people of India settle for "RELATIVELY
>> LESS CORRUPT or CONTROVERSIAL PEOPLE" ??
>> You should reconsider the wisdom of statements you make in a
>> public forum.,
>>
>> Sarbajit
>>
>> On Apr 22, 8:56 am, Sankar Pani <sankarprasadp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > If we start finding faults with each and every person, then only god if
>> > any
>> > will be eligible in your scale to the Drafting committee.At the present
>> > juncture we can choose relatively less corrupt or less controversial
>> > people
>> > but never possible to find a person who do not have any such allegation.
>> > to
>> > me it seems that we have to accept the best in the existing committee
>> > and
>> > and should judge the objective of the committee.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:14 AM, sarbajit roy <sroy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Dear Satishji
>> >
>> > > For the same reason that a mongoose wants to kill a snake.
>> >
>> > > Sarbajit
>> >
>> > > On Apr 22, 8:27 am, Satish Kumar Kapoor <kapoorsat...@yahoo.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > Dear Sarbajit
>> >
>> > > > Why u want to kill drafting committee?
>> >
>> > > > S.K.Kapoor
>> >
>> > > > ________________________________
>> > > > sense ?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sankar Prasad Pani
>> > A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
>> > India
>> > PIN-751007
>> > Cell- 9437279278http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
>
>
> --
> Sankar Prasad Pani
> A-70, Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar, Orissa
> India
> PIN-751007
> Cell- 9437279278
> http://environmentalrights-sankar.blogspot.com/
>
>
>