Monday, June 3, 2013

Re: [IAC#RG] Electric Shock for 'Against' Vote

My take;

The Doctrine of Lapse/Escheat has been replaced by the Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution. A public servant can conveniently interpolate revenue records of even martyrs by the sacrifices of whom these public servants are occupying offices. Sonia holds absolute power to tame public servants including judges under section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

No one is safe (Bible, Luke 19:27) and (Koran 8:39; 9:5; 33:61 etc) in Democracy. No worship place and culture can survive. [ (Bible Deut. 12:1-3) and (Koran, Bani Israel, 17:81)] No one can retain property [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31] and chastity of no woman is safe under the dogmas of the Indian Constitution, [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] Koran (Koran 23:6) and Bible (Bible, Isaiah 13:16).

Even election is not for the rescue of citizens, because no voter can change either Article 29(1) or 39(c) or claim restoration of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Thus, one votes to decide as to who would plunder the subjects, whether Atal or Mulayam or Rahul or Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi or Mayavati? Citizens vote to agree as to under whose regimen one's properties would be usurped, one's women would be raped and one would be slain!


Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9152579041
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site:
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Dr. NC Jain <> wrote:
In my view,voting is a fundamental right but not for criminals.Otherwise, you will find criminals as the elected person which should be avoided in the democracy.

From: MANI sharma <>
Cc: IAC India Resists <>
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Electric Shock for 'Against' Vote

My Dear,

Voting has not been defined as any right in India. many a times prisoners demanded parole or bail for voting in India but that has been turned down by Indian Courts.  Though in a dramatic manner the Italian marines were granted bail for  voting just to project a better image abroad.  Australian Human Rights law declare voting as Human Right i.e. above Fundamental Right. What to take about the rest matters... !
Mani Ram Sharma

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Shrikant Soman <> wrote:
.... 'voter can exercise a negative vote AGAINST a particular candidate (especially sitting candidates/parties) on the ballot'.....
This is an excellent idea. This is real negative voting. It clearly demonstrates 'Disapproval' of a candidate. OTOH  49-0 voting is a 'Neutral' voting. It is counted as 'Zero'. It will not make any impact.

On the lighter note, der should be a system whereby for each 'Against' vote, the candidate should automatically get a electric shock. For all his misdeeds Janta will make him pay in dis life only.
Sent on my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy <>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 22:08:11
To: <>
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Need for Electoral Reforms -- Fundamental Deficiency

Post: ""
Exit: ""
Quit: ""
WWW : :


Post: ""
Exit: ""
Quit: ""

No comments:

Post a Comment